The #1 AI-powered therapy

notes – done in seconds

Try for free

The #1 AI-powered therapy notes – done in seconds

Try for free

This blog is brought to you by YUNG Sidekick –

the #1 AI-powered therapy notes – done in seconds

This blog is brought to you by YUNG Sidekick — the #1 AI-powered therapy notes – done in seconds

Try for free – no credit card required

Back to blog

How Clinicians Should Evaluate Emotional Support Animal Documentation

Stanley Efrem

Sep 10, 2025

More than one-third of mental health providers feel unqualified to make emotional support animal documentation determinations [1]. This statistic reveals a critical gap in clinical training that affects thousands of practitioners daily.

ESA letter requests continue climbing as the pet industry exceeded $100 billion in revenue during 2020 [12]. Yet healthcare professionals lack standardized practice guidelines for handling these requests [11]. The documentation landscape presents serious concerns about provider qualifications and proper assessment protocols. Current data shows 44% of ESA owners received letters from licensed mental health professionals and 29% from primary care physicians. However, 22% obtained documentation from internet-based healthcare providers—nearly half reported no existing treatment relationship with the letter writer [12].

Research supports genuine therapeutic value when properly implemented. Individuals with serious mental illness showed significant reductions in loneliness, depression, and anxiety symptoms twelve months after beginning life with an ESA [1] [3]. These findings highlight the need for evidence-based documentation standards that serve genuine client needs while maintaining professional integrity.

This article outlines a clear framework for evaluating ESA requests and creating legally defensible documentation. Mental health professionals will learn the clinical, ethical, and legal considerations necessary for determining appropriate ESA letter writing and ensuring documentation meets all required standards.

Legal Frameworks Governing ESA Documentation

Mental health professionals must understand the legal landscape surrounding emotional support animal documentation. Federal and state laws create specific requirements for proper documentation and establish clear boundaries for provider responsibilities.

Fair Housing Act (FHA) and Emotional Support Animals

The Fair Housing Act provides the primary legal protection for emotional support animal owners. This federal law defines ESAs as "animals that alleviate one or more identified symptoms or effects of a person's disability" [12]. ESAs differ from service animals because they need no specialized training to perform specific tasks.

Housing providers must allow reasonable accommodations for individuals with disabilities who require emotional support animals. Standard accommodations include waiving "no pets" policies and eliminating pet deposits or fees [12]. Housing providers can only refuse these accommodations when the animal poses a direct threat to others' health or safety, or would cause significant property damage [2].

Your ESA documentation must confirm the individual has a qualifying disability and requires the animal to alleviate specific symptoms. The FHA does not require disclosure of the person's specific diagnosis or condition severity [2].

ADA Limitations on ESA Recognition

The Americans with Disabilities Act takes a stricter stance on emotional support animals. The ADA does not recognize ESAs as service animals in public accommodations and government facilities [3]. ESAs lack the same public access rights granted to service animals under ADA provisions.

Title I of the ADA offers no specific guidance on ESAs in workplace settings [1]. Employers generally handle ESA requests like other reasonable accommodation requests, requiring documentation of disability and necessity.

Clients need clear information that ESA documentation applies primarily to housing situations and does not provide public access rights under the ADA.

Air Carrier Access Act (ACAA) Post-2021 Changes

Air travel regulations for emotional support animals shifted significantly in 2021. Airlines previously accommodated ESAs on flights under ACAA requirements. Recent regulatory changes eliminated airline obligations to recognize emotional support animals [1].

Airlines now accommodate only trained service dogs that perform tasks for individuals with disabilities. Airlines may require documentation confirming the service dog's health, behavior, and training [1]. These changes removed the special status ESAs once held in air travel.

State-Specific ESA Laws: California AB 468 and Florida Statute 760.27

California and Florida enacted targeted legislation governing ESA documentation:

California AB 468 Requirements (effective January 2022):

Establish a client-provider relationship for at least 30 days before providing ESA documentation [13]
Complete a clinical evaluation regarding the need for an emotional support dog [12]
Include license number, jurisdiction, license type, and effective date in documentation [13]
Maintain licensure in the jurisdiction where the client is located [13]

Florida Statute 760.27 offers similar protections with additional documentation verification provisions. Housing providers may request reliable information confirming disability status through government agencies or healthcare practitioners [2]. The statute clearly states that online ESA registrations, certificates, and ID cards alone cannot establish disability or need [2].

Both states target fraudulent ESA documentation while protecting legitimate accommodations for individuals with genuine needs.

Clinical Evaluation of ESA Requests

Proper clinical evaluations for emotional support animal requests demand a structured approach that extends well beyond simple letter writing. Research reveals that 50% of mental health practitioners had made ESA recommendations, yet 25.7% felt unqualified to do so [7].

Establishing a Valid Therapeutic Relationship

Every legitimate ESA evaluation starts with an established therapeutic relationship. Single-session assessments for ESA documentation are typically insufficient and raise ethical concerns [8]. Many online companies issue ESA certification letters without requiring clients to meet or speak with a mental health provider [7]. Ohio guidance specifically mandates face-to-face assessments with clients [9]. The therapeutic relationship must exist prior to ESA letter consideration—California law now requires a relationship of at least 30 days.

Assessing Psychiatric Disability per DSM-5-TR

ESA evaluations are disability determinations requiring documentation of:

A mental impairment due to a psychiatric condition as defined by DSM-5-TR
Substantial limitation in one or more life areas
A connection between the impairment and the mental disorder [3]

Your assessment should include a psychiatric interview, records review, collateral information, and consideration of alternative explanations for reported disabilities [3]. Cross-cutting symptom measures can enhance mental status assessment by identifying additional areas needing inquiry [10].

Evaluating Symptom Alleviation by the ESA

You must determine whether the ESA actually alleviates specific impairments. Younggren explains, "Disability does not mean the individual has an attachment to the ESA, feels happier in proximity to the ESA, or just wants to accompany the animal... It means that the person requires the presence of the animal to function or remain psychologically stable" [11]. Ideal assessment involves observing the individual both with and without the animal present to compare mental status and functioning [12].

Differential Diagnosis: ESA vs Other Interventions

Consider whether an ESA represents the most appropriate intervention or if other treatments might better address your client's needs. First, assess whether the ESA's presence allows more effective daily activity performance, reduces anxiety enough to yield measurable concentration improvements, or facilitates better social interactions [12]. Then consider the evidence base for ESAs, recognizing limited current evidence regarding clinical benefits for psychiatric symptoms [3].

Assessing Client Capacity to Care for the Animal

Your evaluation should include whether the client can properly care for the animal. While human-animal interaction helps people with various disorders, determine whether any impairment is so severe that an animal would be neglected [1]. Consider the animal's welfare—some animals may find the emotional support role too stressful [1].

Ethical Considerations in ESA Letter Writing

Mental health professionals face complex ethical challenges when writing emotional support animal letters that extend well beyond standard clinical considerations.

Role Conflict Between Clinician and Evaluator

Serving dual roles as both therapist and evaluator creates a fundamental ethical dilemma. This situation produces what experts identify as "role conflict" that can compromise professional objectivity [13]. ESA evaluations are disability determinations requiring the same rigorous approach as other forensic assessments, including evaluation of potential malingering [12].

Treating clinicians may struggle to maintain impartiality since therapeutic relationships naturally foster advocacy positions. Greenberg and Shuman note in their landmark article that mixing clinical and forensic roles can potentially damage the therapeutic relationship, as these functions often have divergent goals [13].

Ethics experts recommend referring ESA assessments to independent evaluators whenever possible. This separation helps preserve therapeutic boundaries and ensures evaluations remain objective. "When treating psychologists find themselves unable to be neutral or objective... they should refer their patient to a third party who can possess these qualities" [13].

Informed Consent and Disclosure of ESA Limitations

Mental health professionals must provide thorough informed consent regarding ESA limitations. This includes explicitly discussing that ESA letters primarily apply to housing accommodations rather than public access [7]. Clinicians should alert clients to potential consequences of disability designation in health records—a responsibility often overlooked [12].

Proper informed consent means clarifying the changed landscape for air travel following 2021 regulatory updates, as airlines are no longer required to accommodate ESAs [7]. This transparency prevents clients from developing unrealistic expectations about their animal's access rights.

Avoiding Disability Fraud and Misuse of ESA Letters

Writing ESA letters solely to help clients bring pets to non-pet-friendly venues, avoid pet fees, or bypass breed restrictions constitutes disability fraud—both unethical and illegal [3]. Studies reveal concerning trends: approximately one-quarter of ESA owners obtained their letters through internet sites rather than personal health professionals [14].

Fraudulent documentation undermines legitimate accommodations for those with genuine needs. "Misusing ESA certifications as legal loopholes 'negatively impacts the public's perception of the disabled'" [3].

Clinicians should maintain vigilance for red flags such as clients mentioning ESAs before discussing symptoms, requests coming with pressure or urgency, or approaches by third-party certification companies [4]. States like California and Florida have enacted new legislation specifically targeting these concerns with requirements for established provider relationships and limitations on online certifications [15].

Liability and Legal Precedents for ESA Letters

Court cases now shape how clinicians approach emotional support animal documentation. These legal precedents directly affect your practice and help identify potential liability risks.

Case Review: Riverbrook v. Fabode

The Michigan Court of Appeals ruled in Riverbrook v. Fabode that courts must exercise their "gatekeeper role" when reviewing ESA documentation [16]. This case involved a tenant who submitted an ESA letter from a limited licensed professional counselor following only a brief phone consultation. The court established that housing providers can seek reliable information about disability status and accommodation necessity [16]. Vague form letters that fail to identify specific disabilities may be rejected as insufficient evidence.

Case Review: Furbee v. Wilson

Furbee v. Wilson further clarified client responsibilities when requesting accommodations [17]. The Indiana Court of Appeals determined that landlords can conduct a "meaningful review" of accommodation requests, including requesting documentation about the disability and disability-related need for the animal [18]. Failure to respond to reasonable inquiries about disability status creates a breakdown in the accommodation process [19].

Licensing Risks from Inadequate Evaluations

Inadequate ESA evaluations expose mental health professionals to serious licensing consequences:

Disciplinary action by licensing boards for substandard evaluations [5]
Fraud charges when evaluations lack supporting facts [5]
License revocation, as seen in a California Board of Behavioral Sciences case where a therapist's license was revoked (though stayed) for conducting inadequate ESA assessments through brief telehealth sessions [3]

Cross-State Practice and Telehealth Limitations

State line practice creates additional liability exposure. California law requires healthcare practitioners to hold licenses in the jurisdiction where clients are located [3]. Florida statutes specify that online ESA registrations and certificates cannot establish disability or need [20]. Providers who conduct ESA evaluations via telehealth without proper state licensure face disciplinary sanctions, as demonstrated in multiple enforcement cases [3].

Protect yourself by maintaining detailed evaluation documentation, confirming your licensure in the client's jurisdiction, and ensuring your assessments meet all state-specific ESA documentation requirements.

Key Elements of a Legally Defensible ESA Letter

Effective ESA documentation demands specific elements that protect both clinician and client from legal challenges. Each component serves a distinct purpose in establishing legitimacy.

Professional Letterhead and Contact Information

ESA letters must appear on the licensed mental health professional's official letterhead [21]. Include your full name, license number, specialization, and complete contact information [21]. Housing providers and other officials rely on this information to verify your credentials and confirm authenticity [22].

Statement of Disability and Clinical Justification

Confirm your client has a disability while maintaining confidentiality. Never disclose the specific diagnosis [21]. Focus instead on how the emotional support animal alleviates symptoms [23]. Resource documents recommend including "only minimally necessary clinical information" [3].

Duration of Therapeutic Relationship

Document how long you have treated the client [6]. California law mandates a minimum 30-day relationship before issuing ESA documentation [24]. This detail establishes credibility and demonstrates compliance with applicable regulations.

Avoiding Animal-Specific Claims or Training Assertions

State clearly that you have not evaluated the animal's training, behavior, or well-being [24]. These assessments exceed most mental health professionals' scope of practice and create unnecessary liability exposure.

Documentation Validity: Date and Renewal Requirements

ESA letters typically remain valid for one year [25]. Include both issuance and expiration dates. Clients need renewal documentation to maintain their accommodations [26].

Your letter becomes a legal document that housing providers will scrutinize. Each element must meet professional standards while serving your client's legitimate needs.

Conclusion

Proper ESA evaluation protects both your clients and your professional standing. Mental health professionals face real challenges determining when to provide ESA letters, especially without universal guidelines amid growing demand.

Legal frameworks form the foundation of ethical practice. The Fair Housing Act provides essential protections for individuals with legitimate needs, while recent Air Carrier Access Act changes and state-specific legislation like California's AB 468 have reshaped the documentation landscape. Staying current with these evolving regulations remains critical for compliant practice.

Clinical evaluation stands at the heart of responsible ESA documentation. Establishing genuine therapeutic relationships before considering ESA letters protects against licensing issues and ensures authentic disability assessments. Your evaluation must determine whether the animal specifically alleviates symptoms rather than simply providing comfort.

Ethical decision-making guides this entire process. Role conflicts between clinician and evaluator can compromise objectivity. Clear informed consent about ESA limitations prevents unrealistic client expectations. Vigilance against potential disability fraud preserves accommodations for those with genuine needs.

Liability risks affect clinicians who provide inadequate evaluations. Recent court cases show that vague documentation lacking specific disability connections will face rejection. Your ESA letters must contain essential elements: professional letterhead, appropriate clinical justification, relationship duration, and proper credentials.

Balance compassion with professional judgment when evaluating ESA requests. Emotional support animals can provide genuine therapeutic benefits for specific individuals. Your primary obligation remains providing evidence-based care within appropriate ethical and legal boundaries. Careful evaluation, thorough documentation, and awareness of legal requirements enable you to confidently handle ESA requests while maintaining professional practice standards.

Key Takeaways

Clinicians must navigate complex legal, ethical, and clinical considerations when evaluating emotional support animal requests to ensure professional integrity while serving legitimate client needs.

• Establish a genuine therapeutic relationship of at least 30 days before providing ESA documentation to comply with state laws and avoid licensing risks

• Conduct thorough disability assessments using DSM-5-TR criteria, evaluating whether the animal specifically alleviates psychiatric symptoms rather than providing general comfort

• Include essential elements in ESA letters: professional letterhead, clinical justification without specific diagnosis, relationship duration, and clear validity dates

• Avoid role conflicts by referring ESA evaluations to independent assessors when possible, as mixing therapeutic and forensic roles compromises objectivity

• Provide comprehensive informed consent about ESA limitations, particularly that letters primarily apply to housing accommodations and not public access rights

• Stay current with evolving regulations, as recent changes to air travel policies and state-specific laws like California AB 468 have significantly altered documentation requirements

Remember that ESA documentation is fundamentally a disability determination requiring the same rigor as other forensic assessments. Inadequate evaluations can result in licensing sanctions, legal challenges, and damage to the therapeutic relationship, making thorough clinical evaluation and proper documentation essential for protecting both clinician and client interests.

FAQs

What is required for emotional support animal documentation?

An ESA letter from a licensed mental health professional is the primary documentation needed. This letter should confirm the individual has a qualifying disability and requires the animal to alleviate specific symptoms, without disclosing the exact diagnosis.

How do clinicians evaluate the need for an emotional support animal?

Clinicians should conduct a thorough disability assessment using DSM-5-TR criteria, evaluating whether the animal specifically alleviates psychiatric symptoms. This involves establishing a therapeutic relationship, assessing the impact of the animal on symptoms, and considering alternative interventions.

What are the key elements of a legally defensible ESA letter?

A legally defensible ESA letter should include the clinician's professional letterhead, contact information, license number, a statement of disability without specific diagnosis, duration of the therapeutic relationship, and clear validity dates. It should avoid making claims about the animal's training or behavior.

How has recent legislation affected emotional support animal accommodations?

Recent changes have significantly impacted ESA accommodations. Airlines are no longer required to recognize ESAs on flights, and states like California and Florida have enacted specific laws governing ESA documentation, including requirements for established provider relationships and limitations on online certifications.

What ethical considerations should clinicians be aware of when writing ESA letters?

Clinicians should be mindful of potential role conflicts between therapist and evaluator, provide comprehensive informed consent about ESA limitations, and remain vigilant against disability fraud. It's important to maintain objectivity and consider referring ESA assessments to independent evaluators when necessary.