The #1 AI-powered therapy

notes – done in seconds

Try for free

The #1 AI-powered therapy notes – done in seconds

Try for free

This blog is brought to you by YUNG Sidekick –

the #1 AI-powered therapy notes – done in seconds

This blog is brought to you by YUNG Sidekick — the #1 AI-powered therapy notes – done in seconds

Try for free – no credit card required

Back to blog

Janina Fisher’s Trauma Approach Explained: Key Concepts Every Therapist Should Know

Stanley Efrem

Apr 28, 2025

Janina Fisher changed how we treat trauma by blending neuroscience, somatic approaches, and dissociation theory into powerful therapy techniques. Many clients with complex trauma don't respond well to traditional talk therapy methods. Fisher's framework gives practical answers to these tough cases.

Therapists who want to work better with trauma will find Dr. Fisher's approach adds valuable tools to their practice. Her work on structural dissociation shows how trauma splits the personality into "apparently normal" and "emotional" parts. Fisher's trauma training helps therapists spot and work with these dissociative patterns. Her method stands out because it focuses on the body, unlike purely cognitive approaches. Fisher's training programs teach clients to use physical sensations as healing paths.

This piece covers the basic elements of Fisher's trauma approach. You'll learn to use her techniques, grasp the theory behind them, and put these ideas to work with your clients. These insights will reshape your practice, whether you're starting out in trauma work or you're an experienced therapist looking to improve your skills.

Understanding Janina Fisher’s Trauma Framework

Dr. Janina Fisher's trauma framework stands out in the therapeutic world because it merges body and mind comprehensively. Traditional talk therapy targets thought processes, but Fisher has created a synthesis that deals with how trauma affects multiple dimensions.

What makes her approach different

Dr. Fisher's methodology combines three powerful theoretical traditions. She draws heavily from structural dissociation theory and sees trauma responses as survival-driven adaptations rather than pathological issues. This viewpoint changes how therapists work with clients. They focus on normalizing their experiences instead of treating them as disorders.

Fisher's approach is different from conventional trauma treatments in several ways:

She combines neuroscience, attachment theory, and sensorimotor psychotherapy into one framework
Her methods emphasize parts work and internal family systems concepts
She puts stabilization before processing traumatic material
Her interventions are available even to severely dysregulated clients

Janina Fisher trauma training builds a collaborative therapeutic relationship. The therapist guides rather than directs, which helps clients discover their natural healing abilities. Unlike exposure-based treatments that can overwhelm the nervous system, her methods build resilience step by step through measured experiences.

Her framework also recognizes structural dissociation. Fisher helps you understand why trauma survivors feel fragmented inside. Traumatic experiences can split consciousness into "apparently normal parts" that handle daily life and "emotional parts" that hold traumatic memories and feelings. This helps clients understand their internal experiences without shame.

The role of the body in trauma recovery

The body plays a central role in Fisher's trauma healing model. Her framework shows that trauma lives in the body's nervous system, not just in cognitive memory. Healing must include physical interventions along with verbal processing.

Therapists learn to spot subtle body signals that show dysregulation during Janina Fisher training programs. Instead of "What are you thinking?" Fisher suggests asking "What are you noticing in your body right now?" This redirects attention to physical sensations as valuable information sources.

The nervous system needs specific interventions in Fisher's approach. Clients can spot trauma responses as they happen through mindful awareness of physical sensations. This practice, called somatic mindfulness, creates a chance to stop automatic trauma reactions.

The body becomes a resource in Fisher's model. She teaches specific physical interventions that help regulation:

Orienting to the present environment through sensory awareness
Mindful tracking of physical sensations without judgment
Small movements that counteract freeze responses
Boundary exercises that reinforce physical and psychological safety

Her trauma framework uses "bottom-up" processing. Physical responses are addressed before changing thought patterns. This matches neuroscience research about how trauma disrupts the brain's natural information processing.

Fisher combines structural dissociation theory with body-based interventions to create a unique healing path. Each fragmented "part" has specific physical patterns. Working with the body gives direct access to these split aspects of self. Physical sensations become valuable messages rather than problems to fix.

Dr. Janina Fisher's trauma framework brings a radical alteration to trauma treatment. She sees trauma symptoms as adaptations that once protected people, not problems to fix. This viewpoint promotes self-compassion and provides practical tools for change. Her approach brings hope to complex trauma cases by connecting neuroscience with compassionate clinical practice.

The Core Concepts of Sensorimotor Psychotherapy

Sensorimotor Psychotherapy is the life-blood of Dr. Janina Fisher's approach to trauma healing. Pat Ogden developed this therapeutic modality that is a chance to address trauma through body-centered interventions. These interventions complement Fisher's structural dissociation framework.

Dual awareness and mindfulness

Dual awareness represents a fundamental concept in Sensorimotor Psychotherapy. Knowing how to hold attention on multiple states of consciousness simultaneously defines this skill. Clients learn to observe traumatic memories, emotions, or sensations. They stay aware that they're safe in the present moment, away from past dangers [1].

Dual awareness serves several vital functions in therapy sessions:

The client avoids retraumatization during therapeutic work
Clients can process traumatic material without feeling overwhelmed
The observing self maintains psychological distance from traumatic content
People develop internal stability even with intense emotions

Dual awareness starts developing early in life. Neuroscientist Alan Schore points out that knowing how to identify emotions through physical sensations typically develops through caregiver relationships in childhood. Children learn to connect bodily feelings with emotional experiences when caregivers accurately reflect and label their emotional states [2].

Fisher's implementation of sensorimotor techniques targets this mind-body connection directly. Clients discover how to notice physical sensations, thoughts, and emotions through mindfulness practices. They learn without becoming overtaken by them. This observational stance creates vital separation between traumatic content and the observing self [1].

"In a mindful state that encourages observation rather than reactivity, traumatized individuals learn to become more curious rather than fearful as they notice their emerging thoughts, emotions, sense perceptions, internal body sensations and movements," Fisher explains in her description of the approach [1].

Complex trauma survivors often need explicit education with experiential exercises to practice dual awareness. Many survivors don't deal very well with maintaining this observational stance at first. They either become completely absorbed in traumatic material or stay disconnected from internal experiences [3]. Fisher's training programs show therapists how to build this capacity gradually in severely dysregulated clients.

Tracking somatic responses in real time

Fisher incorporates another key sensorimotor concept beyond dual awareness: up-to-the-minute data analysis of somatic responses. This practice involves watching bodily sensations, postures, movements, and autonomic responses as they emerge during therapy sessions.

The tracking process follows these steps:

Therapists invite clients to notice physical sensations in the present moment
Clients describe these sensations without judgment or interpretation
Both therapist and client watch how sensations shift and change
This information guides therapeutic interventions and reveals trauma-related patterns

This tracking is different from traditional talk therapy approaches. We focused on narrative content in the past. Fisher uses "bottom-up processing" instead. This approach addresses the body's physiological responses before attempting to change cognitive patterns [4].

Janina Fisher trauma training teaches therapists to spot subtle physical cues that signal dysregulation. These include changes in breathing patterns, muscle tension, posture shifts, or autonomic nervous system responses like flushing or pallor. Therapists can "empathically interrupt" when clients begin to dysregulate by actively tracking these responses. This helps clients return to a calmer state [5].

Fisher highlights that trauma survivors often have trouble with interoceptive awareness—knowing how to sense and interpret internal bodily states. Clients rebuild this vital capacity through consistent practice in tracking somatic responses. They learn to see physical sensations as signals rather than threats, which creates opportunities for new responses [6].

Somatic tracking accomplishes multiple therapeutic goals at once. Clients reconnect with dissociated body sensations. The process provides immediate feedback about trauma activation. It creates opportunities to intervene before overwhelming emotions surface. On top of that, it lets both therapist and client witness the body's natural ability to self-regulate with proper support [7].

Working with Structural Dissociation and Parts

Structural dissociation serves as the foundation of Fisher's trauma therapy approach. Clients who deal with complex trauma gain valuable insights from this framework. It helps explain contradictory behaviors and emotions that often leave both therapists and clients confused.

The 'going on with normal life' self

Fisher thought over and renamed what Van der Hart originally called the "apparently normal part" to the "going on with normal life" self. This meaningful change challenges the idea that functional aspects show a "false self" while trauma responses show the "true self." Fisher's view helps clients welcome their ability to function rather than seeing it as fake [8].

The 'going on with normal life' self takes care of daily priorities such as:

Work and professional duties
Household tasks and family needs
Personal and professional goals
Daily activities and organization

This functioning part often operates with emotional numbness. It feels detached from painful memories or experiences them as if they happened to someone else [9]. Many trauma survivors feel "empty" in this mode. They focus on external tasks instead of their internal experiences.

This adaptive splitting lets trauma survivors keep functioning despite carrying overwhelming memories. The intensity of trauma-related emotions would otherwise disrupt daily life [8]. Problems arise when trauma-related parts interrupt the 'going on with normal life' self. These show up as unexpected emotional changes, intrusive thoughts, or behaviors that seem foreign or out of control.

Fight, flight, freeze, submit, and attach parts

Among the 'going on with normal life' self, Fisher identifies five distinct trauma-related parts. These match survival responses that develop during overwhelming experiences. These parts emerge as protective mechanisms when facing danger. They often continue long after the original threat has passed [10].

Fight parts demonstrate through anger, irritability, and confrontational behaviors. These parts prepare the body to defend itself with increased heart rate, muscle tension, and urges to confront perceived threats [11]. Clients might suddenly become hostile or argumentative during therapy sessions when triggered. They often don't understand these dramatic emotional shifts.

Flight parts create avoidance behaviors, including physical and emotional escape attempts. These parts show up as restlessness, anxiety, or strong urges to leave uncomfortable situations [11]. Flight responses often accelerate addictive behaviors, eating disorders, or workaholism to escape overwhelming internal experiences [12].

Freeze parts make people feel "locked up" or paralyzed when facing triggers. Clients describe sudden inability to think clearly, speak, or move when this response activates [11]. Fisher notes that clinicians often misdiagnose these freeze responses as anxiety disorders instead of trauma symptoms [8].

Submit parts emerge when fighting or fleeing wasn't possible during trauma. These parts show up as feelings of defeat, hopelessness, and compliance with others' needs [11]. Submit responses often look like depression rather than trauma-related adaptations [8].

Attach parts (also called "cry for help" parts) look for connection and support during threatening situations. These parts might show desperate clinging, relationship intensity, or idealizing certain people [13]. This response explains contradictory behaviors in conditions like borderline personality disorder. Here, intense attachment needs exist alongside strong fight responses [8].

Fisher's structural dissociation model changes therapy by seeing "symptoms" as adaptive responses that once protected clients. You can help clients notice these parts without shame and encourage greater self-understanding and integration [10].

Applying Janina Fisher’s Methods in Therapy

Therapists can implement specific techniques right away to transform Fisher's theoretical framework into practical clinical interventions for trauma clients. These evidence-based methods turn complex concepts like structural dissociation into therapeutic tools that are available to practitioners.

Using parts language in sessions

Parts language serves as the life-blood of Fisher's clinical approach. This linguistic framework helps clients see trauma responses as separate from their identity rather than part of themselves. Parts language works by presenting trauma responses as adaptive survival strategies instead of dysfunctional behaviors.

The practical phrases below help therapists use parts language effectively:

"It seems like a protective part of you is feeling threatened right now"
"There might be a part that's trying to keep you safe through [behavior]"
"I'm noticing a young part may be present in this moment"

This language reinforces the Janina Fisher structural dissociation model while making it available to clients naturally. Parts language creates psychological distance so clients can observe internal experiences without feeling overwhelmed. This distance helps promote curiosity instead of shame about trauma responses.

Consistent application remains vital to success. Clients naturally adopt this language as they become familiar with it. This shared vocabulary builds stronger foundations for deeper therapeutic work.

Helping clients observe without judgment

Dr. Fisher's approach places observational skills at the heart of trauma recovery. Clients need to witness their internal experiences without criticism to create space for new responses. Judgment often leads to more dysregulation, while curiosity helps promote integration.

Simple mindfulness exercises focused on present-moment awareness work best as starting points. Most clients might resist these practices initially, but steady guidance develops this significant capacity. Short periods of observation gradually extend as tolerance grows.

These questions help promote non-judgmental observation: "What are you noticing in your body right now?" "Can you observe that thought without believing or disbelieving it?" "How would you describe what's happening inside without using good/bad labels?"

Therapists must demonstrate non-judgmental awareness themselves. A calm presence during client dysregulation shows them how to self-regulate. Clients gradually internalize this co-regulatory experience.

Building somatic resources for regulation

Somatic resources - physical practices that regulate the nervous system - provide vital tools in Janina Fisher trauma training. These interventions help clients handle dysregulation when distressed.

Effective somatic resources include:

Orienting to the present – Actively noticing five things you can see, four things you can hear, three things you can touch, two things you can smell, and one thing you can taste
Containment gestures – Physical movements like crossing arms over the chest or placing hands on the heart area to signal safety to the nervous system
Grounding techniques – Focusing on contact points between the body and supporting surfaces (chair, floor, etc.)

Fisher suggests therapists should practice these techniques themselves to understand the experience fully. Janina Fisher trauma approaches emphasize practicing somatic resources during calm states before using them in distress.

Gradual introduction during therapy sessions works best, with joint practice before suggesting home exercises. Trauma disrupts body awareness, so these exercises need patience and regular reinforcement. Tailoring resources to each client's priorities increases their effectiveness and usage likelihood.

Trauma-Informed Stabilization Treatment (TIST)

Dr. Janina Fisher created Trauma-Informed Stabilization Treatment (TIST) to help trauma survivors deal with unsafe behaviors. Her innovative clinical model looks at self-destructive and addictive behaviors through a trauma lens instead of labeling them as personality disorders.

How TIST addresses unsafe behaviors

TIST sees unsafe behaviors as adaptations to trauma rather than mental illness symptoms. This viewpoint helps clients who haven't responded well to standard treatments. Yes, it is common for clients to show better responses to TIST than CBT or DBT because they don't feel judged or labeled [14].

Traditional models focus on managing behaviors. TIST takes a different approach by seeing self-destructive actions as messages from fragmented, trauma-holding parts. Self-harm, addiction, and eating disorders become understandable reactions from traumatized parts trying to handle overwhelming emotions.

TIST goes beyond managing symptoms. The approach wants to make patients safer and reduce their dependence on institutions while building better emotional regulation [15]. Clients often struggle with unsafe behaviors when their prefrontal cortex shuts down during emotional overload, making it hard to use coping skills.

Steps in the TIST model

The treatment follows a well-laid-out four-step process that builds regulation skills:

Psychoeducation - Clients discover how trauma affects their brain and nervous system. They learn why traumatic memories split up and how poor regulation keeps symptoms going [16]. This knowledge helps them make sense of their experiences.
Differentiation and Mindfulness - The structural dissociation model introduces clients to new concepts. They learn to spot self-destructive urges as parts activity [16]. Fisher teaches mindfulness techniques so clients can observe these urges without acting on them.
Differentiating Parts' Feelings and Impulses - Clients practice stepping back from emotions by seeing them as messages from trauma-related parts [16]. This crucial step creates space between clients and overwhelming urges.
Learning to Dis-Identify from Parts - Clients learn to separate themselves from intense emotions in the final phase. They realize these states don't define them but are just aspects of their experience [16].

Benefits for complex trauma clients

TIST provides key advantages for complex trauma treatment:

Works well with clients of all attachment styles and diagnostic groups [14]
Clients stay in treatment longer because they feel understood rather than blamed
Results show fewer self-harm incidents and emergency room visits [14]
Helps severely dysregulated individuals handle emotions better

TIST works exceptionally well with long-term mentally ill clients who rely heavily on institutions [14]. The model helps reduce hospital stays while building internal coping resources.

Therapists who learn TIST through Janina Fisher's training get practical tools to help clients previously called "treatment-resistant." Understanding unsafe behaviors as ways to handle trauma activation lets therapists work together with clients. They develop new regulation strategies while staying compassionate about these behaviors' protective role in the past.

The Therapist’s Role in Fisher’s Model

Fisher's model creates unique challenges for clinicians that are quite different from traditional approaches. You'll need to understand these special requirements to help trauma survivors effectively.

Attunement and co-regulation

Effective trauma therapy in Janina Fisher's model starts with attunement. This approach differs from traditional therapeutic neutrality. Therapists must actively connect with their clients' subtle physiological and emotional changes. This deep awareness lets you spot dysregulation before it becomes overwhelming.

Co-regulation works alongside attunement. The therapist's nervous system helps stabilize their client's dysregulated state naturally through:

A calm presence that provides a physiological template for the client's nervous system
Facial expressions, tone, and breathing pace that offer regulation cues
Emotional stability that creates a safe space for processing difficult material

Janina Fisher trauma training teaches therapists that their regulation state directly affects treatment outcomes. You become a temporary external regulatory system and provide support many trauma survivors missed in their early relationships. This biological support helps clients build their internal regulation capacity gradually.

Balancing empathy with boundaries

Fisher's approach requires a careful balance of compassionate connection and firm boundaries. Severely traumatized clients can feel overwhelmed by empathy alone. This might trigger attachment parts seeking fusion with the therapist. On the other hand, rigid boundaries without warmth could trigger defensive fight responses.

Dr Janina Fisher suggests these ways to find the right balance:

Clear session structure with room for dysregulation
Consistent boundaries about between-session contact
Compassionate curiosity about all parts without getting too involved

The Janina Fisher structural dissociation framework uses boundaries beyond professional ethics. These boundaries provide vital containment to help clients separate past and present relationships. This structured safety helps clients develop healthier attachment patterns naturally.

Your role in Fisher's model goes beyond traditional talk therapy skills. You actively participate in the healing process - staying attuned, regulated, and bounded - to create an environment where trauma recovery can thrive.

Conclusion

Dr. Janina Fisher's trauma approach offers a groundbreaking framework that helps people with complex trauma cases. Traditional therapy models don't deal very well with these cases. You've found how she combines structural dissociation theory, somatic interventions, and parts work to create a detailed treatment method. This method tackles how trauma affects the brain and body.

Fisher's model changes the way you see trauma responses completely. You now see dysregulation, dissociation, and self-destructive behaviors differently. These aren't problems to fix - they're survival strategies that protected people in the past. This change in point of view can revolutionize your approach as a therapist.

Fisher's body-centered approach gives you practical tools to help with trauma stored in the nervous system. Somatic resources, dual awareness techniques, and live tracking of physical sensations help heal in ways that thinking-only approaches miss. Even severely dysregulated clients can build their ability to regulate through these body-based methods.

TIST looks at unsafe behaviors through a trauma-informed lens. This gives hope to clients who were once called "treatment-resistant." You can work better with complex cases and still feel compassion for behaviors that once helped people survive.

The model shows how important you are as a co-regulating presence. Your attentive, boundaried participation creates a template for regulation that trauma survivors often missed growing up. These methods need dedicated practice, but they can create amazing changes for you and your clients.

Fisher's integrated approach gives you a detailed roadmap for trauma treatment. It respects how complex human adaptation can be while showing practical ways to heal. As you use these ideas in your practice, you'll become more effective - especially with clients who haven't been helped by traditional approaches.

FAQs

What makes Janina Fisher's trauma approach unique?

Fisher's approach integrates neuroscience, attachment theory, and sensorimotor psychotherapy. It emphasizes parts work, prioritizes stabilization before processing trauma, and is designed to be accessible even to severely dysregulated clients. The approach views trauma responses as adaptive survival strategies rather than pathologies.

How does Fisher's approach address the body in trauma recovery?

Fisher's model recognizes that trauma is stored in the body's nervous system. It incorporates somatic interventions, mindful tracking of physical sensations, and body-based exercises to promote regulation. This "bottom-up" processing addresses physiological responses before attempting to change cognitive patterns.

What is structural dissociation in Fisher's framework?

Structural dissociation in Fisher's model explains how trauma can split consciousness into a "going on with normal life" self and emotional parts carrying traumatic memories. This framework helps clients understand their internal experiences without shame and provides a language to describe fragmented aspects of self.

How does Trauma-Informed Stabilization Treatment (TIST) work?

TIST reframes unsafe behaviors as trauma-related adaptations rather than symptoms of mental illness. It follows a four-step process: psychoeducation, differentiation and mindfulness, differentiating parts' feelings and impulses, and learning to dis-identify from parts. This approach aims to increase patient safety and develop improved autonomic regulation.

What is the therapist's role in Fisher's model?

In Fisher's model, the therapist's role involves attunement and co-regulation. The therapist actively tunes into clients' subtle physiological and emotional shifts and uses their own regulated state to help stabilize the client. Balancing empathy with clear boundaries is crucial, providing a safe container for processing difficult material while fostering healthy attachment patterns.