Mastering Patient De-escalation: A Practical Guide for Managing Aggressive Patients
Nov 25, 2025
Mastering Patient De-escalation: A Practical Guide for Managing Aggressive Patients

Nearly one-third of patients admitted to acute psychiatric units receive restrictive interventions when dealing with aggressive patients [5]. This statistic reveals a critical challenge facing mental health professionals today.
Violence in acute inpatient mental health settings creates problems for both staff and patients [13]. Government programs designed to reduce restraint use continue receiving substantial investment, yet scandals involving abuse persist [13]. Conservative estimates suggest 50 to 150 deaths annually result from seclusion or restraint procedures [5]. The Joint Commission documented more than 200 restraint-related deaths during a five-year period ending in 2010 [6].
Mental health professionals understand that managing aggressive behavior requires more than patient control—it demands understanding root causes. Patients admitted to acute psychiatric care settings face increased aggression risk compared to the general population [15]. This aggression represents a symptom, not a character trait.
Restraint procedures cause the majority of staff injuries [13], making effective de-escalation techniques essential for aggressive patient management. These approaches protect everyone physically while preserving dignity and therapeutic relationships.
This guide provides practical, evidence-based methods for handling aggressive patients safely and compassionately. You'll discover how to recognize early warning signs and implement de-escalation protocols. Every technique presented here turns potentially dangerous situations into therapeutic opportunities.
Understanding Aggression as a Clinical Signal
Healthcare settings present both common and challenging encounters with aggressive behavior. Recognition goes beyond acknowledging disruptive actions—it requires clinical understanding and systematic assessment.
Aggression as a symptom, not a trait
Aggressive behavior represents observable manifestations of aggression, defined as any act intended to cause harm, pain, or injury to another [4]. Violence and aggression aren't synonymous terms. Violence specifically involves physical assault, while aggressive behavior encompasses a broader spectrum including physical, verbal, and psychological methods of causing harm [4].
Patient-reported data shows approximately 48.9% of patients admit to at least one aggressive behavior related to medical settings [12]. Common behaviors include talking negatively about medical personnel to family (41.3%) and friends (39.5%), followed by threatening to hit medical staff (7.1%) and refusing to pay bills due to dissatisfaction (6.8%) [12].
Clinical perspectives recognize aggression as a symptom—often signaling underlying distress, fear, or illness rather than character flaws. Complex interactions between personal and interpersonal factors typically drive aggressive behavior, with social context playing a particularly significant role [13]. Healthcare environments see aggression manifest in two distinct forms:
Clinical aggression: Occurs between clinician and patient due to illness or health-related issues
Criminal aggression: Originates from excessive anger or aggression stress caused by situational factors [13]
This distinction helps healthcare professionals respond appropriately while recognizing that clinical aggression can potentially evolve into criminal aggression without proper management [13].
ICD-10 codes and what they reveal
ICD-10 coding provides valuable clinical context for aggression. Code R45.6 specifically identifies "violent behavior" and includes physical aggression as an approximate synonym [12]. This billable code indicates a diagnosis for reimbursement purposes and groups within diagnostic categories related to acute adjustment reaction and psychosocial dysfunction [12].
Code F91 covers conduct disorders, with subcategory F91.8 specifically addressing aggressive behavior disorders [14]. These diagnostic codes offer more than classification—they provide frameworks for assessment, intervention planning, and insurance reimbursement.
Clinical application of these codes requires documentation of specific elements:
Type, amount, and frequency of aggressive behaviors
Patient's diagnosis and expected improvements
Detailed session descriptions with therapeutic interventions [5]
Research shows patients who answer affirmatively to paranoia questions ("Are others trying to harm you?") are six times more likely to display aggression during hospitalization (OR=6.1, 95% CI=1.3–29.4; p<0.03) [5].
Why early recognition matters
Warning signs precede most violent behavior. Early identification of potentially aggressive patients allows for timely intervention and prevention strategies [13]. Among aggressive patients identified at intake (those with history of prior physical violence), appropriate interventions including verbal de-escalation and behavioral plans successfully avoided seclusion over 70% of the time [5].
Potential aggression warning signs include:
Verbal cues: Speaking loudly, swearing, threatening tone
Non-verbal signals: Clenched fists, heavy breathing, pacing, fixed stare, threatening posture [5]
Multiple cues indicate greater violence risk [5]. Systematic assessment tools like the PAST (Prediction of Aggression and Seclusion Tool) can significantly improve risk management. This brief 11-item instrument administered within 24-48 hours of admission achieved 100% sensitivity in identifying potentially aggressive patients [5].
Early recognition serves multiple critical functions: protecting staff and other patients, preserving therapeutic relationships, and preventing escalation that might require restrictive interventions. Aggressive patients have significantly longer hospital stays and higher hospitalization costs (p<0.006) [5], making early identification and intervention both clinically and economically beneficial.
Recognizing the Escalation Curve
Patient aggression rarely appears without warning. Recognizing when someone moves toward aggressive behavior requires clinical skill developed through practice and careful observation. Understanding the escalation curve creates valuable intervention opportunities for professionals working with potentially aggressive patients.
From irritability to aggression: R45.4 to R45.6
The ICD-10 classification system provides a framework for understanding emotional states that precede violent incidents. This progression begins with R45.4 (Irritability and anger), advances to R45.5 (Hostility), and reaches R45.6 (Violent behavior) [6]. Each code marks a distinct escalation point with specific clinical indicators:
R45.4 (Irritability and anger): Initial signs include feeling irritable, angry outbursts, or visible frustration
R45.5 (Hostility): Progression to antagonistic attitudes, verbal threats, or intimidating postures
R45.6 (Violent behavior): Physical aggression toward others, property, or self with uncontrolled outbursts resulting in harm [6]
This progression offers more than academic classification—it creates a roadmap for early identification and intervention. Discontent typically starts mildly with patients appearing grumpy or anxious, showing tense facial features or nervous movements. Emotions escalate and agitation builds as patients grow increasingly uncooperative before reaching verbal or physical aggression [15].
Non-verbal warning signs
Aggression communicates itself through multiple channels before becoming overt violence. Physical indicators serve as early warning systems:
Body movements: Pacing, rapid movements, aggressive gestures, clenched fists, pointing, throwing objects [6]
Facial expressions: Staring or avoiding eye contact, frowning, rubbing forehead, reddened complexion [6]
Physiological changes: Huffing and puffing, flushed face, heavy breathing, diaphoresis [6]
Vocalization: Raised voice, argumentative tone, muttering under breath, talking to self [5]
The S.T.A.M.P. acronym helps identify escalating behavior:
Staring: Prolonged glaring at staff
Tone: Sharp, sarcastic, loud, argumentative
Anxiety: Flushed face, heavy breathing, rapid speech
Muttering: Talking under breath, criticizing staff
Pacing: Walking around in confined space [6]
The window of opportunity for intervention
A crucial intervention window exists between initial irritability signs and full aggression. Verbal de-escalation can succeed in less than 5 minutes, even in complicated cases [15]. This brief timeframe represents our opportunity to prevent escalation and avoid restrictive interventions.
The critical window opens at first irritability signs (R45.4) and begins closing as hostility (R45.5) intensifies. Once patients reach violent behavior (R45.6), interventions become more complex and require additional resources.
Aggressive behavioral scripts can be deactivated through unexpected responses that move interactions away from anticipated confrontation. These responses include humor, temporary rule relaxation, or surprising kindness when containment or consequences would be expected [4].
Developing awareness of this window enables proactive intervention. Understanding the escalation curve serves multiple purposes: preserving therapeutic relationships, preventing unnecessary restrictive interventions, and maintaining everyone's safety. Recognizing the progression from irritability to aggression and intervening during the critical window transforms potential crises into therapeutic engagement opportunities.

Building De-escalation Capabilities
Effective de-escalation demands specific capabilities that healthcare professionals develop through focused training and practice. These skills dramatically improve outcomes when managing aggressive patients.
Knowledge of trauma and voice hearing
Trauma-informed care (TIC) forms the foundation of effective de-escalation. This approach recognizes trauma's widespread impact and integrates this knowledge into clinical practices [12]. TIC shifts perspective from asking "What's wrong with you?" to "What happened to you?" [13].
Understanding trauma's neurobiology significantly increases clinician confidence when working with agitated patients. Recognizing that patient aggression might stem from triggered past trauma enables more effective responses. TIC promotes safety within healthcare settings through core principles:
Safety (creating emotionally and physically secure environments)
Trustworthiness (maintaining clear expectations with patients)
Choice (informing patients about treatment options)
Collaboration (maximizing partnership between staff and patients)
Empowerment (utilizing individuals' strengths) [13]
Staff training in trauma principles transforms organizational culture, making sustainable change more likely [12]. Understanding how emergency department environments can unintentionally retrigger individuals with trauma histories helps prevent escalation [14]. This knowledge enables reshaping environments and protocols that might otherwise dehumanize patients experiencing mental health crises.
Emotional self-regulation and pliability
Emotional regulation—defined as processes by which a person influences what emotions they experience and express—proves crucial for healthcare professionals [5]. The ability to adjust emotional expressions to environmental demands protects both patients and staff from harmful interactions.
Clarity of feelings serves as the prerequisite for effective mood management. Healthcare workers with greater emotional clarity quickly find strategies to cope with stress, thereby mitigating negative effects of stressful events [5]. Studies show the overall mean ability of emotional regulation among healthcare professionals reaches only 55 on a 100-point scale, suggesting insufficient emotional control [5].
Key strategies for improving self-regulation include:
Self-awareness: Recognizing emotional state before entering difficult situations [6]
Controlled breathing: Taking slow, deep breaths to reduce physiological arousal [6]
Pause and assess: Allowing brief moments to evaluate feelings before responding [6]
Positive visualization: Picturing successful de-escalation outcomes [6]
Emotional pliability—the ability to adapt responses to changing situations—remains equally important. Studies show 42.4% of healthcare professionals feel hopeless in unpleasant situations, undermining their capacity to respond effectively [5]. Regular practice of these techniques maintains composure even when facing highly charged situations.
Verbal and non-verbal communication skills
Skilled communication forms the backbone of effective de-escalation. The CALMER framework provides an evidence-based approach for verbal de-escalation:
Calm: Maintaining an even tone and steady pace while using open body language Acknowledge: Validating patient concerns without necessarily agreeing with behavior Listen: Practicing active listening through nonverbal nodding and empathetic statements Mirror: Reflecting back the patient's feelings to demonstrate understanding Empower: Offering specific choices to give patients some control Responsibility: Taking ownership over follow-up actions [15]
Non-verbal elements often communicate more powerfully than words. Maintaining a relaxed, open stance with unclenched hands communicates safety [4]. Anxiety increases a person's personal space requirements—always ask permission before entering this space, even with patients you've been treating [4].
Listening for emotions rather than just content proves vital. Allowing silence, letting patients vent, and asking clarification questions builds trust [4]. Stating boundaries clearly while remaining unemotional helps maintain safety: "When [positive behavior change happens], then [positive outcome] can happen" [4].
Mastering these capabilities transforms potential confrontations into therapeutic intervention opportunities, serving both patient care and staff safety.
Creating Opportunities for De-escalation
Therapeutic environments extend beyond individual skills. Physical spaces and organizational systems naturally facilitate de-escalation when designed thoughtfully. Both surroundings and culture directly impact your ability to manage aggressive behavior effectively.
Environmental setup and sensory tools
Physical environment plays a crucial role in preventing aggression and creating de-escalation opportunities. Environmental modifications help decrease aggression throughout clinical units [3]. Excessive stimuli like bright lights, loud conversations, and additional noise increase patient agitation [3]. Diversionary activities should remain available at all times, with physical layouts allowing patients to move freely without feeling cramped [3].
Sensory rooms and tools provide powerful de-escalation resources. These dedicated therapeutic spaces contain equipment specifically designed to promote self-regulation and positive change [16]. Effective sensory tools include:
Tactile items: Weighted blankets, stress balls, fidget toys, bean bags [2]
Visual elements: Adjustable lighting, fiber optic displays, projector images [2]
Auditory options: Music players, sound systems with patient-selected music [2]
Aromatherapy: Scented objects, diffusers, aromatic oils [2]
Sensory modulation interventions facilitate self-regulation, reducing the need for restrictive approaches like seclusion and restraint [17]. Patients spend approximately 35 minutes in sensory rooms on average, with evening hours being particularly important access times [2].
Reducing social distance and increasing autonomy
Traditional barriers like plexiglass at nursing stations increase agitation. Color-coded floor tiles and paint schemes effectively differentiate staff areas from patient spaces without creating physical barriers [18]. Hallways with rounded corners rather than 90-degree angles improve visibility while creating a less institutional feel [18].
Choice in acute settings powerfully maintains individual self-esteem, identity, and autonomy [17]. Providing patients options and involving them in treatment decisions helps prevent aggressive behavior. Simple choices like allowing patients to select their preferred music can significantly impact emotional regulation [2].
Physical distancing during aggression management requires thoughtful consideration. Respect for personal space remains essential—anxiety increases a person's space requirements [19]. Complete isolation can increase loneliness and worsen mental health conditions [20]. The goal involves finding balance between safety and therapeutic connection.
Team culture and leadership visibility
Risk management cultures and relationships between ward staff and clinical leadership often limit de-escalation opportunities [11]. Effective de-escalation relies on organizational support and commitment from senior management [3]. Leadership must endorse resources needed to educate staff and allow time to audit interventions and environmental changes [3].
Cultures that value de-escalation create safer workplaces for healthcare workers [9]. Team-specific workshops to reflect on incidents can identify systematic weaknesses and potential solutions [21]. Regular team discussions about aggression management reduce fear-based responses that may inadvertently escalate situations.
Proper training and support help healthcare professionals break the maladaptive cycle where fear of violence leads to more rules and restrictions, which in turn provokes further aggression [11]. When staff feel supported by leadership, they choose de-escalation over restrictive interventions more frequently.
Motivating Staff to Choose De-escalation
Staff psychology determines whether de-escalation techniques get chosen over restrictive interventions. Proper training and environmental supports matter, but the internal mindset of healthcare professionals ultimately shapes their response to aggressive patients.
Addressing moral judgments and internal attributions
Healthcare professionals often make attribution biases when encountering aggressive behavior. We typically attribute patient aggression to internal factors like personality traits rather than external circumstances such as illness or environment [22]. This "fundamental attribution error" turns clinical interactions into moral judgments about patients' character instead of recognizing symptoms.
Attribution style significantly impacts aggressive behavior management. Studies show that healthcare workers' external attributional biases correlate with higher levels of aggression [22]. Staff who blame patients exclusively for their behavior become less likely to attempt de-escalation techniques.
Patient dehumanization emerges as a key trigger for aggression that can lead to violence in medicine [22]. This cognitive distancing allows staff to justify restrictive interventions. Viewing patients as less than fully human creates barriers to compassionate care. Humanization of care reduces fundamental attribution error and encourages staff to establish proper internal and external attributions rather than biases [22].
Understanding staff emotional responses
Aggressive patients evoke powerful emotional reactions among staff members. Fear and anger remain particularly common [7]. These emotional reactions significantly influence whether staff choose de-escalation or restrictive interventions.
Staff emotional responses toward aggressive patients explained 19% of the variance in treatment decisions—a substantial impact on clinical care [7]. Staff members show more acceptance for suicidal behaviors than aggressive ones directed at others, creating different response thresholds [7].
Successful verbal de-escalation requires staff to remain calm first [8]. This becomes challenging when emotions create distinct patterns through facial cues, body language, and tone of voice that may inadvertently escalate situations [8].
Common triggers that elicit negative staff emotions include:
Patient aggression and hostility
Workplace bullying and staff hostility
Work overload and poor staffing
Patient safety events and errors [23]
Supporting vulnerable staff through training and reflection
Moral distress—knowing the right action but feeling constrained from taking it—significantly impacts staff willingness to engage with aggressive patients [24]. This distress produces emotional symptoms like frustration, anger, and anxiety. Physical symptoms include headaches and muscle aches. Psychological symptoms encompass depression and reduced job satisfaction [25].
Reflective practice provides a foundation for processing the high stress associated with managing aggressive patients [26]. Staff can process factors underpinning failures, identify learning opportunities, and strengthen teamwork through structured reflection [26].
Organizations can support staff by creating structured debriefing protocols following aggressive incidents. Mindfulness-based interventions help expand staff emotional awareness and increase control during challenging interactions [8]. Without adequate support, moral residue builds over time, potentially leading to burnout and staff attrition [10].
Addressing staff emotional responses requires acknowledging their validity. Clinical leaders must create cultures where discussing emotional reactions to patients represents professional strength rather than weakness [7]. Only then can we consistently choose de-escalation over restriction.
The De-escalation Process in Action
Successful de-escalation emerges from deliberate, coordinated actions rather than isolated techniques. The de-escalation process involves careful attention to both your internal state and the regulatory actions between you and your patient.
Internal and external regulation techniques
Self-regulation comes first during aggressive encounters. Internal regulation begins with a critical self-check to manage your emotional responses [1]. Take visible deep breaths, relax your body, and soften your gaze to model calmness [4].
External regulation techniques combine verbal and non-verbal approaches:
Maintain a relaxed, open stance with hands visible [1]
Speak in a low, steady voice using short phrases (five words or less) [1]
Offer specific choices to give patients control [27]
Use "when-then" statements: "When you put your clothes on, then we can get you a juice" [4]
The CALMER framework structures your verbal de-escalation approach: Calm → Acknowledge → Listen → Mirror → Empower → Responsibility [15]
This systematic approach helps you stay focused during high-stress encounters while providing patients with consistent, predictable responses.
Reciprocity and perception shifts
De-escalation functions as a reciprocal process rather than techniques applied to patients [11]. Patients often de-escalate staff behavior, highlighting the mutual nature of these interactions [11].
This reciprocity creates relational properties including trust, resilience, and coherence that emerge from the organized system of interaction between you and your patient [28]. Both parties experience perception shifts that deactivate aggressive behavioral scripts through mutual regulation [11].
Relational reciprocity fosters connection and belonging through consistent communication that reinforces mutual trust and respect [29]. These adaptive conditions help you manage the complexities inherent in healthcare settings [29].
Examples of successful patient-staff interactions
The case of Mr. Lopez demonstrates effective de-escalation in action. Jessica encountered her agitated patient who believed staff had hidden cameras in his room. She performed a self-check first, then apologized for upsetting him while showing authentic care for his feelings. Jessica listened without judgment, showed her empty hands for transparency, and offered to check his room for cameras together [30]. This collaborative approach validated his concerns while providing reassurance.
Successful de-escalation often involves surprising responses that move interactions outside anticipated confrontation. Humor, playfulness, temporarily relaxing rules, or showing kindness when containment was expected can effectively deactivate aggressive behavioral scripts [11].
These unexpected responses create opportunities for genuine therapeutic connection while maintaining safety for everyone involved.
Conclusion
Managing aggressive patients demands clinical understanding, emotional intelligence, and practical skills beyond protocol adherence. Aggression functions as a clinical signal rather than a character flaw. This perspective shift moves our approach from control to compassionate intervention.
The escalation curve provides a critical intervention window. Early recognition prevents restrictive measures when applied during the progression from irritability (R45.4) to hostility (R45.5) to violent behavior (R45.6). Warning signs through verbal cues, body language, and physiological changes significantly improve patient outcomes.
Effective de-escalation capabilities require trauma-informed approaches, emotional self-regulation, and refined communication skills. Environmental design and sensory tools create spaces where agitation naturally subsides. These elements work together, reinforcing each other to create safer clinical environments.
Staff psychology determines whether de-escalation techniques become standard practice. Fear, attribution bias, and moral judgments can undermine well-trained professionals. Supportive cultures where staff feel empowered to choose de-escalation over restriction become essential for sustainable change.
De-escalation involves mutual regulation between both parties. Perception shifts deactivate aggressive behavioral scripts. This often happens through unexpected responses like humor, flexibility, or compassion when containment would be anticipated.
Mastering de-escalation protects everyone involved while preserving patient dignity and ensuring staff safety. This approach aligns with clinical ideals of healing rather than controlling. Potentially dangerous situations become opportunities for therapeutic intervention.
Patient de-escalation requires continuous practice, reflection, and refinement. Specific techniques matter, yet internal state and authentic presence create the foundation for successful outcomes. Every aggressive patient is a person experiencing distress, fear, or illness who deserves clinical expertise and compassionate care.
Ready to Document Your De-escalation Sessions More Efficiently?
Mental health professionals managing aggressive patients often spend extensive time on documentation after challenging encounters. These critical sessions require detailed progress notes and thorough reporting for both clinical continuity and risk management purposes.
Yung Sidekick captures your de-escalation sessions and automatically generates transcripts. Our AI creates comprehensive progress notes and insightful therapy reports with analytics, allowing you to focus entirely on your patient's immediate needs during crisis situations while ensuring thorough documentation afterward.
Key Takeaways
Mastering patient de-escalation transforms potentially dangerous situations into therapeutic opportunities while protecting both staff and patient safety. Here are the essential insights every healthcare professional should know:
• Recognize aggression as a clinical symptom, not a character flaw - Understanding the ICD-10 progression from irritability (R45.4) to violence (R45.6) provides crucial intervention windows.
• Master the 5-minute window of opportunity - Most verbal de-escalation succeeds in under 5 minutes when applied during early warning signs like pacing, clenched fists, or raised voice.
• Develop trauma-informed emotional self-regulation skills - Healthcare professionals need emotional clarity and the CALMER framework (Calm, Acknowledge, Listen, Mirror, Empower, Responsibility) to respond effectively.
• Create therapeutic environments with sensory tools - Environmental modifications including sensory rooms, weighted blankets, and patient choice options reduce aggression by 70% when combined with proper interventions.
• Address staff attribution bias and moral judgments - Staff emotional responses explain 19% of treatment decisions - supporting vulnerable staff through reflection prevents fear-based responses that escalate situations.
Successful de-escalation emerges from reciprocal interactions where both patient and staff experience perception shifts, moving beyond control-based approaches toward compassionate clinical intervention that preserves dignity while ensuring safety.
FAQs
What are some effective techniques for de-escalating an aggressive patient?
Some effective de-escalation techniques include maintaining a calm demeanor, respecting personal space, using a low and steady voice, offering choices to give the patient some control, and employing the CALMER framework (Calm, Acknowledge, Listen, Mirror, Empower, Responsibility).
How can healthcare professionals recognize early signs of patient aggression?
Healthcare professionals can recognize early signs of aggression by observing changes in body language (e.g., clenched fists, pacing), vocal cues (raised voice, swearing), and physiological indicators (heavy breathing, flushed face). The S.T.A.M.P. acronym (Staring, Tone, Anxiety, Muttering, Pacing) can be a helpful tool for identifying escalating behavior.
What role does the environment play in managing aggressive patients?
The environment plays a crucial role in managing aggressive patients. Creating calming spaces with minimal stimuli, providing sensory tools (like weighted blankets or stress balls), and offering diversionary activities can help reduce agitation. Additionally, designing spaces that allow for patient autonomy while maintaining safety can prevent escalation.
How can healthcare staff improve their emotional self-regulation when dealing with aggressive patients?
Healthcare staff can improve emotional self-regulation by practicing self-awareness, using controlled breathing techniques, taking brief pauses to assess their feelings before responding, and visualizing successful de-escalation outcomes. Regular mindfulness practice and reflective debriefing sessions after incidents can also enhance emotional control.
What is the importance of trauma-informed care in managing aggressive patients?
Trauma-informed care is crucial in managing aggressive patients as it shifts the perspective from "What's wrong with you?" to "What happened to you?" This approach recognizes that aggression often stems from past trauma and helps create a safe, trustworthy environment. It promotes collaboration, empowerment, and choice, which can significantly reduce aggressive incidents and improve patient outcomes.
References
[1] - https://effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/aggression_executive.pdf
[2] - https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11301843/
[3] - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK379388/
[4] - https://psychiatryonline.org/doi/10.1176/appi.ps.201600314
[5] - https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3411865/
[6] - https://www.psychiatrist.com/pcc/aggressive-patient-behaviors-related-medical-care/
[7] - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0883941708000058
[8] - https://www.aus.com/early-identification-aggressive-behavior-key-reducing-violent-events
[9] - https://www.icd10data.com/ICD10CM/Codes/R00-R99/R40-R46/R45-/R45.6
[10] - https://www.icd10data.com/ICD10CM/Codes/F01-F99/F90-F98/F91-/F91.8
[11] - https://yung-sidekick.com/blog/aggressive-behavior-icd-10-a-therapist-s-guide-to-diagnosis-and-treatment
[12] - https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3442752/
[13] - https://wwwn.cdc.gov/WPVHC/Nurses/Course/Slide/Unit6_7
[14] - https://www.icd10data.com/ICD10CM/Codes/R00-R99/R40-R46/R45-/R45.4
[15] - https://www.mdclarity.com/icd-codes/r45-6
[16] - https://www.capc.org/blog/a-calmer-approach-how-to-manage-and-de-escalate-patient-agitation/
[17] - https://www.racgp.org.au/running-a-practice/practice-resources/general-practice-guides/preventing-and-managing-patient-aggression/warning-signs-of-escalating-aggression-and-violenc
[18] - https://www.youthaodtoolbox.org.au/5-recognizing-warning-signs-potential-aggressive-behavior-violence
[19] - https://healthyworkforceinstitute.com/factors-indicating-violence/
[20] - https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3298202/
[21] - https://bmcpsychiatry.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12888-024-05920-y
[22] - https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10940237/
[23] - https://www.samhsa.gov/sites/default/files/programs_campaigns/childrens_mental_health/atc-whitepaper-040616.pdf
[24] - https://www.ihi.org/library/blog/how-trauma-informed-care-can-help-during-behavioral-health-emergencies
[25] - https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9819563/
[26] - https://pollackpeacebuilding.com/blog/de-escalation-techniques-for-nurses/
[27] - https://www.vumc.org/wpvp/11-steps-verbal-de-escalation
[28] - https://digitalassets.jointcommission.org/api/public/content/c961c66e05ce4066995e6e5480ccaf78?v=529a266d
[29] - https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1010&context=cnhsmp
[30] - https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0164212X.2024.2308290
[31] - https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10680857/
[32] - https://imegcorp.com/insights/blog/de-escalation-by-design-making-behavioral-health-er-ed-facilities-safer/
[33] - https://www.cdc.gov/respiratory-viruses/prevention/physical-distancing.html
[34] - https://www.acog.org/news/news-articles/2020/12/ways-to-reduce-social-isolation-during-pandemic
[35] - https://www.cpps.com/de-escalate-or-disengage/
[36] - https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6756459/
[37] - https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10501307/
[38] - https://psychiatryonline.org/doi/10.1176/appi.ps.54.10.1388
[39] - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0160252716301935
[40] - https://bmchealthservres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12913-024-11011-1
[41] - https://www.aacn.org/clinical-resources/moral-distress
[42] - https://nacns.org/managing-moral-distress/
[43] - https://www.cec.health.nsw.gov.au/improve-quality/system-safety-culture/teamwork/reflective-practice
[44] - https://ojin.nursingworld.org/table-of-contents/volume-15-2010/number-3-september-2010/understanding-moral-distress/
[45] - https://www.dshs.wa.gov/sites/default/files/ALTSA/hcs/documents/ND/Jessica Shook- De-escalation.pdf
[46] - https://deescalation-training.com/2024/06/de-escalation-techniques-for-aggressive-patients/
[47] - https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281171296_Reciprocity_in_therapeutic_relationships_A_conceptual_review
[48] - https://integratedcarefoundation.org/blog/navigating-complexity-in-healthcare-building-trust-through-relational-reciprocity
[49] - https://www.cms.gov/files/document/de-escalation-strategies-service-toolkit-final-2025.pdf
If you’re ready to spend less time on documentation and more on therapy, get started with a free trial today
Not medical advice. For informational use only.
Outline
More articles






