A patient may know perfectly well that they are anxious, repeatedly choose emotionally unavailable partners, become overwhelmed whenever someone criticizes them, or withdraw whenever intimacy becomes possible. They may even be able to describe the pattern in considerable detail. Yet knowing what happens does not necessarily explain why the same pattern continues.

This is one of the clinical problems psychodynamic psychotherapy is designed to address.

Rather than focusing exclusively on symptom reduction, psychodynamic psychotherapy examines the processes that organize a person's emotional and interpersonal life: unconscious motivations, internal conflicts, attachment expectations, defenses, recurring relationship patterns, self-representations, and the ways earlier experiences continue to influence present functioning.

Modern psychodynamic psychotherapy is considerably broader than the classical image of psychoanalysis. Contemporary approaches range from relatively brief, focused treatments to longer-term therapies addressing personality organization and chronic interpersonal difficulties. They may be highly structured, with explicit treatment goals and defined therapeutic techniques, rather than relying on unrestricted free association.

The evidence base has also changed. Psychodynamic psychotherapy is no longer appropriately described as an approach supported only by theory or clinical tradition. Contemporary reviews have found evidence for its efficacy across several common mental disorders, although the strength of evidence varies by disorder and treatment model. Research also suggests that outcomes are related to processes such as increased insight, improved affect awareness, changes in defensive functioning, reflective functioning, and improvements in interpersonal patterns.

For practicing clinicians, the more useful question is therefore not whether psychodynamic psychotherapy "works," but what it is particularly good at changing, which patients are likely to benefit, and how its techniques should actually be used in the room.

What Is Psychodynamic Psychotherapy?

Psychodynamic psychotherapy is a family of therapeutic approaches derived from psychoanalytic theory but adapted for contemporary clinical practice.

At its core is the assumption that psychological functioning is influenced by processes that are not always immediately conscious. A person's behavior may therefore make more sense when examined in relation to conflicting wishes, fears, defenses, attachment expectations, internalized relationships, and previous experiences.

The therapist is interested not only in the content of a patient's thoughts but also in patterns.

For example, a patient repeatedly enters relationships with emotionally unavailable partners. A purely descriptive approach might focus on helping the patient recognize the pattern and make different choices. A psychodynamic formulation may go further:

What does emotional unavailability represent to this patient? What do they expect from closeness? What happens when another person becomes genuinely available? What feelings are defended against? What role does the patient's own behavior play in recreating the pattern?

The goal is not simply to discover a childhood explanation.

The goal is to develop a more flexible capacity to understand one's own emotional experience and relationships.

The American Psychological Association describes psychodynamic psychotherapy as a form of in-depth psychotherapy focusing on unconscious processes as they appear in present behavior, with goals including self-awareness and understanding the influence of the past on present behavior.

The Central Concepts of Psychodynamic Therapy

Although different psychodynamic schools use different terminology, several concepts appear repeatedly across contemporary approaches.

Unconscious Processes

Psychodynamic therapy assumes that not all psychologically important motives are consciously accessible.

A patient may consciously want intimacy while repeatedly behaving in ways that prevent intimacy. They may consciously want professional success while becoming anxious whenever advancement becomes possible. They may insist that criticism does not bother them while becoming unusually defensive whenever their competence is questioned.

The therapist is interested in the discrepancy.

Importantly, contemporary psychodynamic work does not require the therapist to assume that every unexplained behavior has a hidden symbolic meaning. Interpretations should remain hypotheses that can be tested collaboratively against the patient's experience.

Conflict

Psychodynamic formulations frequently conceptualize symptoms as emerging from conflicts between competing motivations.

A patient may simultaneously want closeness and fear dependence.

They may want recognition while fearing envy or exposure.

They may want autonomy while fearing abandonment.

They may want to express anger while fearing that anger will destroy relationships.

The resulting compromise can become a symptom or repetitive behavior.

For example, someone who experiences anger toward others as dangerous may suppress it. Instead of expressing anger, they may become excessively accommodating and subsequently develop resentment, exhaustion, or depressive symptoms.

The therapeutic task is not simply to "get rid of" the symptom. It is to understand what psychological function the symptom serves and whether alternative ways of managing the conflict are possible.

Defense Mechanisms: Not Just "Resistance"

Defense mechanisms are another central component of psychodynamic formulation.

Defenses can be understood as ways of managing affect, internal conflict, anxiety, or threatening psychological experiences. They are not necessarily pathological. Everyone uses defenses, and some are adaptive.

The clinical question is whether a particular defensive pattern is flexible and contextually appropriate or rigid and costly.

Commonly discussed defenses include:

• avoidance;

• repression;

• denial;

• projection;

• intellectualization;

• rationalization;

• reaction formation;

• splitting;

• displacement;

• isolation of affect;

• acting out;

• dissociation;

• humor;

• sublimation.

Consider intellectualization. A patient may provide an exceptionally sophisticated analysis of a painful breakup while showing almost no awareness of sadness, anger, or vulnerability.

The problem is not that the patient is thinking too much.

The question is whether intellectual analysis has become a way of thinking instead of feeling.

A psychodynamic intervention might therefore gently shift attention from explanation to experience:

"You've explained very clearly why the relationship could not have worked. As you say all of that, though, I notice that we haven't really talked about what it felt like to lose it."

This is very different from accusing the patient of intellectualizing.

Transference: Why the Therapeutic Relationship Matters

Transference is one of the concepts most associated with psychodynamic psychotherapy.

In contemporary clinical practice, transference can be understood as the activation of relational expectations, feelings, interpretations, and interpersonal patterns within the relationship with the therapist.

A patient may expect criticism because they anticipate criticism from authority figures. Another may become unusually dependent because closeness activates fears of abandonment. A patient may assume that the therapist is disappointed after missing a session even though the therapist has expressed no such reaction.

The therapist's task is not to assume that every reaction is transference.

The therapeutic relationship is real. The therapist's actual behavior matters.

Instead, transference becomes particularly useful when a repetitive interpersonal pattern emerges within therapy and resembles patterns found elsewhere.

This makes the therapeutic relationship a source of clinical information rather than merely the setting in which treatment occurs.

Countertransference as Clinical Information

Countertransference refers broadly to the therapist's emotional and cognitive responses to the patient.

Contemporary psychodynamic clinicians do not necessarily regard these reactions as something that should simply be eliminated. They can sometimes provide information about the interpersonal field.

A therapist may notice:

• an unusually strong desire to rescue the patient;

• irritation when the patient repeatedly asks for reassurance;

• feeling incompetent around a particular patient;

• feeling unusually admired or idealized;

• wanting to withdraw;

• feeling responsible for the patient's decisions.

The important distinction is between using the reaction as information and acting it out.

A therapist who feels compelled to rescue a patient might ask:

"What is happening in the relationship that makes me feel responsible for solving this person's problems?"

The answer may illuminate something about the patient's interpersonal expectations.

It may also reveal something about the therapist.

Sometimes it reveals both.

Psychodynamic Formulation: From Symptoms to Patterns

A strong psychodynamic formulation connects symptoms, personality functioning, developmental history, interpersonal patterns, and maintaining processes.

A useful formulation does not need to be excessively complicated.

For example:

Presenting problem:
Recurrent depressive episodes following romantic rejection.

Developmental context:
Early caregiving characterized by inconsistent emotional availability.

Core relational expectation:
"People will eventually leave when they see what I really need."

Defensive pattern:
Minimizing needs and presenting as highly independent.

Interpersonal pattern:
Choosing partners who provide limited emotional availability, then experiencing their distance as confirmation of abandonment.

Therapeutic manifestation:
Increasing concern about therapist availability when treatment becomes emotionally important.

Treatment focus:
Increasing awareness of attachment-related expectations, tolerating dependency needs, examining avoidance, and developing more flexible ways of relating.

This formulation is more clinically useful than simply writing:

"Patient has abandonment issues."

It creates hypotheses that can guide intervention.

The Core Conflictual Relationship Theme

One influential psychodynamic framework is the Core Conflictual Relationship Theme (CCRT).

The CCRT organizes recurring interpersonal episodes around three components:

1. Wish — what the person wants from another person.

2. Response of Other — what the person expects or perceives the other person to do.

3. Response of Self — how the person subsequently feels, thinks, or behaves.

For example:

Wish:
"I want someone to understand and care about me."

Expected response of other:
"They will eventually find me demanding and pull away."

Response of self:
"I become anxious, suppress my needs, and then feel resentful."

The value of this model is its simplicity. Instead of treating each relationship problem as unique, the therapist looks for a repeating relational sequence.

Once identified, the sequence can be examined in current relationships and, when clinically relevant, within the therapeutic relationship.

How Psychodynamic Therapy Actually Works in the Room

One common misconception is that psychodynamic psychotherapy consists primarily of the therapist interpreting unconscious material.

In contemporary practice, the therapist may use a much wider range of interventions.

These include:

Clarification

Helping the patient describe an experience more precisely.

"When you say you felt uncomfortable, was it closer to embarrassment, anger, fear, or something else?"

Confrontation

Drawing attention to a discrepancy or contradiction.

"You say that you want people to know when you are struggling, but you also seem to hide any sign that you need help."

Interpretation

Offering a hypothesis about the meaning or function of a pattern.

"I wonder whether keeping people at a distance protects you from the possibility of needing them and then being disappointed."

Exploration of Affect

Moving from intellectual description toward emotional experience.

"As you tell me what happened, what are you noticing emotionally right now?"

Exploration of the Therapeutic Relationship

Examining what is occurring between patient and therapist.

"I wonder whether my asking that question felt to you like criticism rather than curiosity."

The skill lies partly in knowing which intervention is appropriate at which moment.

Supportive vs Expressive Psychodynamic Techniques

Not every patient benefits from intensive interpretation.

Psychodynamic treatments often exist along a continuum between supportive and expressive interventions.

Supportive interventions strengthen functioning. They may involve validation, encouragement, clarification, emotional support, reality testing, and helping the patient manage current stressors.

Expressive interventions aim to increase awareness of internal conflicts, defenses, affect, and interpersonal patterns.

A patient with relatively strong psychological resources may be able to tolerate more exploratory and interpretive work.

A patient experiencing severe instability, acute crisis, significant cognitive impairment, or limited affect tolerance may require a more supportive approach.

This is not a hierarchy in which expressive therapy is "better." Supportive psychotherapy itself has a substantial clinical role across a wide range of psychiatric conditions and levels of functioning.

The appropriate question is:

What level of therapeutic challenge can this patient use productively right now?

Brief Psychodynamic Psychotherapy

Psychodynamic therapy does not necessarily mean years of treatment.

Brief psychodynamic psychotherapy is a family of time-limited approaches in which the clinician identifies a central focus and maintains attention to that focus throughout treatment.

The American Psychological Association describes brief psychodynamic psychotherapy as typically involving no more than approximately 25 sessions, although the exact duration varies by model.

A brief treatment might focus on:

• a recurrent relationship pattern;

• a specific loss;

• difficulties with anger;

• a transition;

• interpersonal conflict;

• anxiety related to dependency;

• a recurring self-esteem problem.

The therapist is generally more active than in traditional open-ended psychoanalysis.

For example:

"We've now seen the same pattern in your relationship with your partner, your supervisor, and your sister. I think it would be useful for us to keep this pattern as one of the central focuses of our remaining sessions."

This creates a clear therapeutic frame while preserving psychodynamic depth.

When Is Psychodynamic Psychotherapy Particularly Useful?

Psychodynamic psychotherapy can be appropriate across a wide range of clinical presentations.

Research has examined psychodynamic approaches for:

• depressive disorders;

• anxiety disorders;

• panic disorder;

• somatic symptom disorders;

• personality disorders;

• interpersonal difficulties;

• chronic relational problems;

• complex emotional patterns.

The strongest clinical indication is not necessarily a particular diagnosis.

It is often a type of problem.

Patients may benefit when symptoms are closely intertwined with recurring interpersonal patterns, self-concept, emotional avoidance, unresolved conflicts, or difficulties understanding their own reactions.

For example, two patients may both meet criteria for generalized anxiety disorder.

Patient A primarily needs help learning exposure-based strategies and reducing reassurance-seeking.

Patient B has already tried multiple symptom-focused interventions but repeatedly becomes anxious whenever relationships become emotionally significant, has difficulty identifying anger, and cannot understand why anxiety increases after positive interpersonal experiences.

A psychodynamic formulation may be particularly valuable for Patient B.

Psychodynamic Therapy for Depression

Psychodynamic psychotherapy has a substantial evidence base in depression.

The therapeutic focus may differ according to the patient's presentation.

For some patients, depression is strongly associated with interpersonal loss and dependency. For others, excessive self-criticism, shame, suppressed anger, or chronic feelings of inadequacy may be more central.

A psychodynamic formulation might ask:

What happens internally when this patient experiences disappointment?

What meaning does failure have for their sense of self?

How do they respond to anger toward others?

Do they direct aggression toward themselves?

What interpersonal expectations maintain withdrawal?

The treatment therefore moves beyond symptom reduction toward understanding the psychological processes through which depressive states are produced and maintained.

Importantly, psychodynamic psychotherapy should not be presented as an alternative to appropriate risk assessment, pharmacotherapy when indicated, or other evidence-based interventions.

Psychodynamic Therapy for Personality Disorders

Personality pathology is an area in which psychodynamic approaches can be particularly relevant because the treatment directly addresses enduring patterns of relating, self-experience, defenses, and affect regulation.

Several structured psychodynamic treatments have been developed specifically for personality disorders, including transference-focused psychotherapy and mentalization-based approaches, although these should not be treated as interchangeable with generic psychodynamic therapy.

Research has also found that psychodynamic treatments can produce improvements in personality functioning and symptoms among patients with personality disorders.

This is clinically important because improvement may occur at multiple levels.

A patient may experience fewer symptoms while still repeating the same interpersonal pattern. Conversely, changes in personality functioning—such as greater reflective capacity, more flexible defenses, and improved relationships—may support broader and more durable improvements.

What Does the Evidence Say?

The evidence base for psychodynamic psychotherapy is now considerably larger than it was several decades ago.

An umbrella review of systematic reviews evaluating psychodynamic therapy against updated criteria for empirically supported treatments found evidence supporting psychodynamic therapy across several common mental disorders. The review also examined mechanisms of change and real-world effectiveness rather than limiting its analysis to symptom outcomes.

The evidence does not mean that psychodynamic psychotherapy is equally effective for every disorder, every patient, or every treatment format. Nor does it demonstrate that psychodynamic therapy is universally superior to CBT or other established approaches.

A more defensible conclusion is that psychodynamic psychotherapy is an evidence-supported family of treatments with demonstrated efficacy for several common clinical problems, with meaningful evidence concerning mechanisms such as insight, affect awareness, defensive functioning, and interpersonal change.

This is a more clinically useful conclusion than the old debate over whether psychodynamic therapy is "scientific."

Mechanisms of Change

One of the most interesting areas of contemporary psychodynamic research concerns how change occurs.

Research has identified several potential mechanisms.

Insight

Patients may develop a more coherent understanding of why they respond to situations in particular ways.

But insight alone is not necessarily sufficient.

A patient can intellectually understand their pattern while continuing to enact it.

Affect Awareness

The patient becomes better able to identify, tolerate, and differentiate emotional states.

Instead of:

"I feel bad."

they may increasingly recognize:

"I'm angry because I felt dismissed, but I'm also afraid that expressing the anger will make the relationship unstable."

That increased emotional differentiation can change behavior.

Defensive Flexibility

The goal is not to eliminate defenses.

It is to help patients develop a wider repertoire of ways to regulate distress.

Someone who previously relied almost exclusively on avoidance may become capable of tolerating difficult conversations without withdrawing.

Reflective Functioning

The patient becomes better able to consider their own mental states and those of other people as complex, changing, and potentially different from their assumptions.

This can reduce rigid interpretations such as:

"She didn't answer because she's angry with me."

and replace them with:

"I immediately assumed she was angry. I don't actually know what happened."

Interpersonal Change

Ultimately, many psychodynamic treatments aim for changes that extend beyond the therapy room.

The patient begins to recognize recurring relationship patterns earlier, make different choices, communicate needs more directly, and tolerate relational uncertainty more effectively.

Transference Interpretation: When Less Is More

One of the most important clinical lessons from contemporary research is that more interpretation is not automatically better.

Research examining transference interpretation has produced heterogeneous findings. Some studies demonstrate benefits, while others suggest that the relationship between intensity of transference interpretation and outcome depends on patient characteristics, treatment context, therapeutic alliance, and other factors.

This has a practical implication:

Do not interpret transference simply because you can identify it.

Ask:

• Is the pattern sufficiently established?

• Can the patient tolerate discussing it?

• Is the therapeutic alliance strong enough?

• Is the interpretation clinically relevant?

• Will it increase self-understanding?

• Am I interpreting because the patient needs it or because I want to demonstrate insight?

The last question is particularly useful in supervision.

A sophisticated interpretation delivered at the wrong moment can be less useful than a simple observation that helps the patient notice what is happening.

The Therapeutic Alliance Still Matters

Psychodynamic therapy does not operate outside the general principles of psychotherapy.

The therapeutic alliance remains strongly associated with treatment outcome across psychotherapy modalities. A large meta-analysis covering more than 30,000 patients found a robust relationship between alliance and outcome.

This does not mean that psychodynamic therapy should become purely supportive.

Rather, the alliance provides the working context in which difficult material can be explored.

A patient is more likely to examine shame, dependency, anger, envy, or fear of abandonment when they can experience the therapist as sufficiently reliable to survive the exploration.

The alliance therefore does not compete with psychodynamic work.

It makes deeper work possible.

A Clinical Example

A 36-year-old patient seeks therapy because of repeated relationship difficulties.

She describes herself as "independent" and is proud of rarely needing anyone. Her partners, however, tend to be emotionally distant. When a partner becomes less available, she becomes intensely preoccupied with the relationship but avoids directly asking for reassurance. Eventually she becomes angry, withdraws, and ends the relationship.

A CBT formulation might identify beliefs such as:

"If I show that I need someone, they will reject me."

A psychodynamic formulation might additionally examine the conflict between the wish to be cared for and the fear of dependency.

In therapy, the same pattern gradually emerges. The patient values the therapist's opinion but insists that she does not need much from therapy. When the therapist is unavailable for one session, she becomes unusually distant during the following appointment.

Rather than immediately interpreting this as transference, the therapist observes the sequence:

"I noticed that after I was away last week, you seemed much less interested in talking with me."

The patient initially dismisses the observation.

With further exploration, she acknowledges:

"I figured you probably had more important patients."

This becomes clinically meaningful because the patient's familiar interpersonal sequence has appeared within therapy:

desire for connection → expectation of reduced importance → withdrawal → confirmation of distance.

The therapy can now examine the pattern while it is occurring, rather than discussing it only retrospectively.

Common Mistakes in Psychodynamic Practice

Interpreting Too Quickly

A therapist identifies a childhood connection and immediately explains the patient's current behavior through it.

The problem is that an interpretation can become a conclusion before it becomes a hypothesis.

Treating Everything as Transference

Sometimes the therapist is simply late.

Sometimes the patient is responding accurately to a poorly communicated boundary.

Not every reaction is unconscious repetition.

Confusing Insight With Change

Understanding why someone behaves a certain way does not automatically give them the capacity to behave differently.

Insight should ideally lead to experimentation, emotional processing, and changes in functioning.

Overvaluing Childhood History

Developmental history is important, but therapy should not become an archaeological project in which every current difficulty is traced back to childhood.

The clinically relevant question is:

"How is this history operating now?"

Ignoring the Present

Psychodynamic therapy is sometimes caricatured as being entirely about the past.

Contemporary psychodynamic work is strongly concerned with the present—including what happens between therapist and patient in the current session.

How to Structure a Psychodynamic Session

There is no single correct psychodynamic session structure, but a useful clinical sequence is:

1. Identify what is emotionally active

What is the patient bringing today, and why does it matter now?

2. Follow affect

Where does the patient's emotional state change while they are speaking?

3. Identify patterns

Does today's problem resemble something recurring?

4. Examine defenses

What happens when the patient approaches something emotionally threatening?

5. Consider interpersonal meaning

What does the patient expect from other people?

6. Use the therapeutic relationship when appropriate

Is the same pattern appearing between patient and therapist?

7. Consolidate

What has the patient understood differently by the end of the session?

This structure provides enough direction to prevent psychodynamic therapy from becoming an unstructured conversation while retaining flexibility.

Psychodynamic Therapy vs CBT

The distinction is often overstated.

CBT and psychodynamic therapy differ in their theoretical models and typical emphases, but both can involve identifying patterns, examining beliefs, developing insight, and changing behavior.

The choice should not be reduced to which therapy is "better."

For many patients, the most important factor is whether the treatment formulation accurately captures the processes maintaining their difficulties.

FAQ

What is psychodynamic psychotherapy?

Psychodynamic psychotherapy is a family of therapies that examines unconscious processes, internal conflicts, defenses, attachment patterns, interpersonal relationships, and the influence of past experiences on present functioning. Contemporary forms range from brief, focused treatments to longer-term therapies.

Is psychodynamic psychotherapy evidence-based?

Yes. Contemporary systematic reviews and meta-analyses provide evidence supporting psychodynamic therapy for several common mental disorders. The strength of evidence varies by disorder and specific treatment model, and psychodynamic therapy should not be assumed to be superior to all other evidence-based treatments.

What disorders can psychodynamic therapy treat?

Research supports its use across several conditions, including depression, anxiety disorders, somatic symptom disorders, and personality disorders. It may also be useful when symptoms are strongly intertwined with interpersonal difficulties, chronic emotional patterns, or personality functioning.

How long does psychodynamic therapy last?

It depends on the treatment model. Brief psychodynamic therapies may involve a defined number of sessions, while other psychodynamic treatments are longer-term and may continue for many months or years.

Does psychodynamic therapy focus on childhood?

Childhood experiences may be explored when they help explain current patterns, but contemporary psychodynamic psychotherapy is not simply "talking about childhood." The emphasis is on understanding how earlier experiences influence present emotional and interpersonal functioning.

Conclusion

Psychodynamic psychotherapy is best understood not as a therapy that simply "looks into the past," but as a method for understanding how psychological patterns are organized and repeated in the present.

Its distinctive contribution is the attempt to connect symptoms with the processes underneath them: conflict, defenses, attachment expectations, self-representations, affect regulation, and recurring interpersonal patterns.

For clinicians, the most useful psychodynamic work is rarely about producing the most sophisticated interpretation. It is about identifying the pattern that matters, understanding its function, and helping the patient experience enough of that pattern in the present to develop an alternative.

The therapeutic relationship can be particularly valuable because it provides an opportunity to observe interpersonal expectations as they occur rather than reconstructing them entirely from memory.

At the same time, contemporary psychodynamic practice requires restraint. Not every symptom has a hidden meaning. Not every therapist reaction is countertransference. Not every interaction is transference. And insight by itself is not synonymous with therapeutic change.

The strongest modern formulation is therefore both depth-oriented and empirically informed: explore unconscious processes, but test interpretations; consider developmental history, but remain anchored in the present; use the therapeutic relationship, but maintain boundaries; and pursue insight alongside changes in affect regulation, defenses, relationships, and functioning.

That is what makes psychodynamic psychotherapy clinically relevant today—not its historical association with psychoanalysis, but its continuing attempt to answer a difficult question in psychotherapy:

Why does a person keep doing, feeling, and experiencing the same things even after they understand that the pattern is hurting them?

References

1. Shedler, J. (2010). The efficacy of psychodynamic psychotherapy. American Psychologist, 65(2), 98–109.

2. Leichsenring, F., & Rabung, S. (2008). Effectiveness of long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy: A meta-analysis. JAMA, 300(13), 1551–1565.

3. Steinert, C., Munder, T., Rabung, S., Hoyer, J., & Leichsenring, F. (2017). Psychodynamic therapy: As efficacious as other empirically supported treatments? A meta-analysis testing equivalence of outcomes. American Journal of Psychiatry, 174(10), 943–953.

4. Leichsenring, F., Abbass, A., Hilsenroth, M. J., Leweke, F., Luyten, P., Keefe, J. R., & Midgley, N. (2023). The status of psychodynamic psychotherapy as an empirically supported treatment for common mental disorders—An umbrella review based on updated criteria. World Psychiatry, 22(2), 286–304.

5. Abbass, A., Hancock, J. T., Henderson, J., & Kisely, S. (2006). Short-term psychodynamic psychotherapies for common mental disorders. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.

6. Town, J. M., Diener, M. J., Abbass, A., Leichsenring, F., Driessen, E., & Rabung, S. (2012). A meta-analysis of psychodynamic psychotherapy outcomes: Evaluating the effects of research-specific procedures. Psychotherapy, 49(3), 276–290.

7. Leichsenring, F., Leweke, F., Klein, S., & Steinert, C. (2015). The empirical status of psychodynamic psychotherapy—An update: Bambi's alive and kicking. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 84(3), 129–148.