The #1 AI-powered therapy

notes – done in seconds

Try for free

The #1 AI-powered therapy notes – done in seconds

Try for free

This blog is brought to you by YUNG Sidekick –

the #1 AI-powered therapy notes – done in seconds

This blog is brought to you by YUNG Sidekick — the #1 AI-powered therapy notes – done in seconds

Try for free – no credit card required

Home

Blog

Therapy

Situational vs. Clinical: Differential Diagnosis Protocol for Stress-Related Depressive Reactions

Stanley Efrem

Dec 1, 2025

Distinguishing situational vs. clinical depression presents one of the most common diagnostic challenges you'll face in clinical practice. When a client arrives in your office overwhelmed by a recent life stressor, you must determine whether their symptoms reflect an adjustment disorder with depressed mood or the beginning of a major depressive episode. This distinction is far from academic—it directly impacts treatment decisions and clinical outcomes.

Situational depression, also known as adjustment disorder with depressed mood, develops within 3 months after experiencing a significant stressor that has overwhelmed your client's ability to cope. However, clinical depression typically presents with symptoms that seem disproportionate to any identifiable trigger. Although both conditions share similar presentations, their treatment paths differ significantly. With situational depression, symptoms usually improve within 6 months after the stressor has resolved, whereas clinical depression often requires more intensive and prolonged intervention. Furthermore, untreated situational depression can eventually transform into clinical depression, making accurate differential diagnosis crucial for preventing condition progression.

Throughout this article, you'll discover a structured 4-axis diagnostic framework that helps differentiate between these conditions, specific clinical markers to watch for, and tailored treatment approaches for each diagnosis. By strengthening your differential assessment skills, you'll be better equipped to provide appropriate care while avoiding both the risk of over-pathologizing normal reactions and under-treating serious clinical conditions.

Situational vs. Clinical Depression: Why the Distinction Matters

Making accurate diagnostic distinctions between situational and clinical depression remains a critical clinical skill. Precise diagnosis directly impacts treatment selection, prevents inappropriate interventions, and significantly influences patient outcomes. The stakes are particularly high considering that roughly four out of ten patients with severe psychiatric disorders receive incorrect diagnoses [1].

Misdiagnosis Risks: Overpathologizing Grief vs. Missing MDD

The diagnostic challenge creates two opposing risks that require careful navigation. On one hand, there's the danger of pathologizing normal grief or stress responses. On the other, there's the risk of missing genuine clinical depression that requires prompt intervention.

Notably, research indicates that more than half of people with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) are misdiagnosed—a staggering 57.60% according to structured clinical interview comparisons [1]. This statistic underscores the complexity of accurately identifying clinical depression, especially when it coexists with significant life stressors.

The consequences of misdiagnosis extend beyond simple categorization errors:

False-positive diagnosis can lead to unnecessary medication, potential stigmatization, and inflated prevalence rates that undermine the credibility of the diagnostic system [2].
False-negative diagnosis might result in lack of functional improvement, delayed remission, and postponed or completely missed necessary treatments [1].

Importantly, misdiagnosis impacts treatment effectiveness. For example, using a passive, supportive approach (ideal for grief) with a client experiencing biological depression may lead to therapeutic impasse, potentially reinforcing the client's sense of hopelessness.

The bereavement exclusion controversy exemplifies this diagnostic tension. Historically, DSM-IV advised clinicians against diagnosing major depression within two months following the death of a loved one [3]. Nevertheless, this exclusion was removed in DSM-5, reflecting growing recognition that bereavement doesn't protect individuals from developing clinical depression [3].

Adjustment Disorder vs. Major Depressive Episode (DSM-5 Criteria)

Understanding the distinct diagnostic criteria for these conditions provides the foundation for accurate differential assessment.

Adjustment Disorder with Depressed Mood (F43.21) requires:

Emotional/behavioral symptoms developing within 3 months of an identifiable stressor [4]
Distress out of proportion to the severity/intensity of the stressor or significant functional impairment [4]
Symptoms that don't meet criteria for another mental disorder [4]
Symptoms that typically resolve within 6 months after the stressor ends [4]

Major Depressive Episode criteria include:

At least 5 of 9 specific symptoms present nearly every day for at least two weeks [5]
Must include either depressed mood or loss of interest/pleasure (anhedonia) [5]
Symptoms cause clinically significant distress or functional impairment [5]
Symptoms aren't attributable to a medical condition or substance [5]

The key differentiation points between these conditions include:

Trigger relationship: Adjustment disorder has a clear temporal relationship to an identifiable stressor, whereas MDD may occur with or without specific triggers [6].
Symptom duration: Adjustment disorder symptoms typically resolve within 6 months after the stressor ends, while MDD often persists longer without treatment [7].
Symptom quality: In grief and adjustment reactions, painful feelings come in waves often intermixed with positive emotions; in MDD, mood and thoughts remain almost constantly negative [3].
Self-concept: Self-esteem is typically preserved in adjustment disorder, whereas feelings of worthlessness and self-loathing are common in MDD [3].

Differentiating these conditions requires careful consideration of proportionality, duration, and qualitative aspects of the symptoms. Despite symptom overlap, research demonstrates these are distinct conditions with different prognoses and treatment needs [5].

The 4-Axis Diagnostic Framework for Differential Assessment

The clinical differentiation between situational and clinical depression requires a structured assessment beyond simply matching symptoms to DSM-5 criteria. This 4-axis framework provides you with a systematic approach to evaluate the qualitative differences that often distinguish these conditions in real-world clinical practice.

Axis 1: Proportionality of Mood to Stressor Severity

The first diagnostic axis examines whether your client's emotional response is proportionate to the stressor's severity. In situational depression, the relationship between stressor and symptom intensity typically remains proportional, whereas in clinical depression, symptoms often appear disproportionate to any identifiable trigger.

Research demonstrates that individuals with clinical depression tend to appraise daily stressors as more severe and experience a greater intensity of negative emotions during stressor exposure [8]. Specifically, even though people with depression do not necessarily report a higher frequency of daily stressor events, they evaluate these stressors as more threatening and less controllable [8].

This pattern aligns with the stress generation theory, which suggests that the neurobiology of depression influences cognitive patterns and coping mechanisms, thereby affecting how stressors are perceived and processed [8]. When assessing proportionality, focus on:

The client's subjective appraisal of stressor severity
Objective assessment of life disruption caused by the stressor
Comparison of symptom intensity to normative responses
Duration of symptoms relative to the persistence of the stressor

Axis 2: Anhedonia vs. Situational Sadness

The second axis examines a critical qualitative difference between situational and clinical depression: the preservation of hedonic capacity. Anhedonia—the inability to experience pleasure from previously enjoyable activities—is a core symptom of clinical depression and fundamentally different from situational sadness [9].

Anhedonia can be further delineated into:

Anticipatory anhedonia: Reduced capacity to anticipate pleasure
Consummatory anhedonia: Diminished experience of pleasure during activity participation [9]

In situational depression, individuals typically maintain the capacity for positive emotional experiences despite concurrent sadness [10]. They can experience moments of relief, connection, and even joy amidst their distress. Conversely, individuals with clinical depression demonstrate what researchers call "emotion context insensitivity"—a diminished reactivity to both positive and negative stimuli [8].

Additionally, recent research challenges the conventional view that depression is simply persistent sadness. Studies using ecological momentary assessment reveal that people with clinical depression often experience rapid fluctuations between high and low moods, a phenomenon known as mood instability, which exists in up to 13.9% of the adult population [11].

Axis 3: Self-Concept Integrity in Reactive vs. Clinical States

The third axis focuses on self-esteem and self-concept integrity. In clinical depression, the self becomes fundamentally altered—not simply the same self with superimposed symptoms, but a different self inhabiting a world perceived differently [1].

Self-concept integrity remains relatively preserved in situational depression, whereas clinical depression profoundly affects one's sense of self-worth. Research indicates that individuals with mood-reactive self-esteem—where self-esteem fluctuates with sadness levels—report higher levels of rumination, more persistent sad mood, and increased depression symptoms over time [12].

In clinical depression:

The depressed person sees themselves as "defective, inadequate, diseased, or deprived" [1]
Self-focused attention increases significantly [1]
Selective focus on negative feedback and recall of negative self-descriptors becomes prominent [1]
Self-understanding in relationships changes, with beliefs about being a burden on others [1]

Axis 4: Responsiveness to Support and Environmental Shifts

The final axis examines how symptoms respond to environmental changes and social support. Situational depression typically shows greater responsivity to positive environmental shifts, supportive interventions, and the passage of time.

Situational depression, by definition, tends to improve as the situation resolves or as the individual adapts to the stressor [13]. Typically, symptoms last less than 6 months and often improve once the triggering situation changes [13]. In contrast, clinical depression persists regardless of circumstantial improvements.

The social dimension is particularly revealing—clinical depression severely affects social functioning, surpassing impairments seen in other chronic medical conditions [14]. Moreover, social cognitive performance inversely correlates with depression severity, with negative emotional biases persisting even during remission periods [14].

When assessing this axis, evaluate:

Response to positive life events or environmental changes
Improvement patterns following supportive interventions
Persistence of symptoms despite situational resolution
Impact on social functioning and relationship quality

By systematically evaluating these four axes, you can develop a more nuanced differential diagnosis that goes beyond symptom checklists to capture the qualitative differences between situational and clinical depression.

Clinical Markers of Major Depressive Episode (F32.x)

Major depressive disorder reveals itself through distinct clinical markers that extend well beyond temporary feelings of sadness. When differentiating clinical from situational depression, certain symptoms serve as reliable indicators of a biological disorder requiring medical intervention rather than a proportionate reaction to life stressors.

Persistent Anhedonia and Psychomotor Changes

Anhedonia—the diminished ability to experience pleasure from previously enjoyable activities—stands as one of the most reliable diagnostic markers of clinical depression. Unlike situational sadness where enjoyment capacity remains intact, anhedonia fundamentally alters your client's relationship with pleasure. Approximately 70% of individuals with major depressive disorder exhibit clinically significant anhedonia [2]. This symptom manifests in two distinct forms:

Anticipatory anhedonia: Reduced ability to expect or anticipate pleasure
Consummatory anhedonia: Diminished pleasure experience during activity participation

The presence of anhedonia correlates with worse clinical outcomes, including greater depression severity, increased suicidality, and poor response to standard antidepressant treatments [3]. Additionally, anhedonia often persists as a residual symptom after other depressive symptoms have improved [2].

Psychomotor changes—either retardation or agitation—provide observable clinical markers. These manifest as slowed movement, delayed responses, decreased eye contact, or conversely, restless agitation [15]. Such changes reflect alterations in fundamental neurological processes rather than simply emotional distress.

Melancholic Features and Suicidal Ideation

Melancholic depression represents a distinct subtype characterized by a "distinct quality of mood" fundamentally different from normal sadness. This subtype affects between 16%-53% of patients with depressive disorders [16] and presents with:

Lack of mood reactivity to typically pleasurable stimuli
Morning worsening of symptoms
Early morning awakening
Excessive guilt
Significant weight loss
Psychomotor disturbances

Clinical research indicates melancholic depression responds differently to treatment compared to non-melancholic depression. It shows superior response to tricyclic antidepressants versus selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors [17], rapid treatment response in some cases [17], and excellent response to electroconvulsive therapy [17].

Suicidal ideation requires vigilant monitoring, particularly in melancholic depression. Studies show that depression with melancholic features carries 2.16 times higher suicide risk compared to non-melancholic depression [4]. Risk factors for suicide attempts in melancholic depression include female gender, alcohol use, living alone, sleep disorders, and frequent depressive episodes [16].

Neurovegetative Symptoms: Appetite, Sleep, Energy

Neurovegetative symptoms—disruptions in basic biological functions—serve as crucial diagnostic markers. Comparatively, these symptoms manifest differently between clinical and situational depression:

Sleep disturbances in clinical depression commonly feature early morning awakening and poor sleep quality that doesn't improve despite adequate opportunity [15]. Moreover, sleep problems independently correlate with suicidal ideation, attempts, and deaths [16].

Appetite and weight changes occur bidirectionally, creating distinguishable symptom patterns. Research identifies two main neurovegetative subtypes of depression [5]:

Typical neurovegetative pattern: Decreased appetite, weight loss, and insomnia—associated with higher cortisol and ghrelin levels [5]
Atypical/reversed neurovegetative pattern: Increased appetite, weight gain, and hypersomnia—associated with elevated leptin, inflammatory markers, insulin levels, and higher BMI [5]

Energy depletion in clinical depression manifests as profound fatigue unrelated to exertion and unrelieved by rest. This differs substantially from the stress-related fatigue seen in situational depression, which typically resolves with rest or removal of stressors.

First thing to remember when conducting your differential assessment: these clinical markers rarely appear in isolation. Instead, they cluster together, creating distinctive symptom profiles that help differentiate major depressive disorder from stress-related emotional reactions.

Adjustment Disorder with Depressed Mood (F43.21) Profile

Adjustment disorder with depressed mood represents a specific clinical entity defined by emotional symptoms occurring in response to identifiable life stressors. This condition, coded as F43.21 in the ICD-10-CM classification system, offers a framework for understanding depressive reactions that don't meet the threshold for major depressive disorder yet cause significant distress [18]. As you conduct your differential assessment, understanding the distinct profile of this condition proves essential for accurate diagnosis and treatment planning.

Onset Within 3 Months of Identifiable Stressor

The temporal relationship between stressor and symptom development forms a cornerstone of adjustment disorder diagnosis. A defining characteristic is the emergence of emotional or behavioral symptoms within three months of exposure to an identifiable stressor [19]. This clear temporal connection distinguishes adjustment disorder from major depression, which may develop without any obvious precipitating event.

For a diagnosis of adjustment disorder with depressed mood, you must identify:

A specific stressful event or multiple stressors that preceded symptom onset
Symptoms developing within the 3-month timeframe following stressor exposure [20]
Clinical evidence linking the stressor to symptom development

The time-limited nature of adjustment disorder is reflected in diagnostic expectations—symptoms typically resolve within six months after the stressor or its consequences have terminated [19]. In fact, adjustment disorder is categorized as either acute (symptoms lasting less than six months) or chronic (symptoms persisting six months or longer) [6]. This time-bound course differentiates it from major depressive disorder, which often follows a more prolonged trajectory without intervention.

Preserved Capacity for Joy and Emotional Responsiveness

In contrast to the pervasive anhedonia characteristic of major depression, individuals with adjustment disorder with depressed mood maintain a fundamental capacity for emotional responsiveness. This preservation of hedonic capacity represents a key qualitative difference between these conditions [7].

When assessing patients with suspected adjustment disorder, pay attention to:

Mood fluctuations that correlate with cognitive presence of the stressor [7]
Greater affective reactivity compared to the persistently poorly modulated mood seen in clinical depression
Temporary sadness that doesn't eliminate the ability to experience joy from activities previously found pleasurable [21]

Importantly, as Semprini et al. note, "although in both disorders the mood is sad, in MDE it is persistently poorly modulated, whereas in AD it depends on the cognitive presence of the stressor, leading to greater affective reactivity" [7]. This distinction helps explain why individuals with adjustment disorder often respond positively to environmental changes and supportive interventions.

Stress-Related Fatigue vs. Depressive Fatigue

Fatigue commonly accompanies both adjustment disorder and major depression, yet qualitative differences exist between these symptom presentations. Stress-related fatigue in adjustment disorder typically:

Relates directly to the identified stressor [22]
Improves with rest or removal of the stressor [23]
Lacks the profound, persistent quality characteristic of depressive fatigue

In contrast, energy depletion in clinical depression manifests as fatigue unrelated to exertion and unrelieved by rest [23]. Research indicates that stress-related fatigue results from perceptual responses to life events, whereas depressive fatigue stems from neurophysiological changes involving irregularities in hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal cortex activity [22].

Consequently, patients with adjustment disorder often describe feeling "overwhelmed" or "pushed to a breaking point" [6], with fatigue representing a natural response to excessive demands rather than the core biological symptom seen in major depression. With adjustment disorder, symptoms typically abate once the individual adapts to the stressor or when the stressor resolves—a pattern rarely seen in clinical depression [6].

Treatment Path A: Facilitated Adaptation for Situational Depression

Treatment of situational depression begins with recognizing its reactive nature. Once properly identified using the differentiation framework discussed earlier, treatment should focus on facilitating natural adaptation rather than addressing an underlying biological condition.

Psychoeducation and Grief Normalization

Initially, effective treatment starts with helping clients understand that their feelings represent normal responses to abnormal situations. Grief counseling prioritizes normalization and validation of patients' feelings, informing them that their experiences are common [24]. This validation creates a sense of shared experience, subsequently reducing shame and mitigating the intensity of negative emotions.

Psychoeducation serves as an important foundation for individuals experiencing situational depression. Research evaluating internet-based grief support tools found significant improvements in attitude (eta-square = .177), self-efficacy (eta-square = .106), and reductions in anxiety (eta-square = .083) [25]. Hence, simply helping clients understand the nature of their condition can enhance adaptive adjustment.

Behavioral Activation for Situational Depression

Behavioral activation represents a practical, straightforward approach particularly suited for situational depression. This approach focuses on increasing engagement in rewarding activities which is reinforced and sustained [1].

Primary components of behavioral activation include:

Activity monitoring and scheduling
Assessment of life goals and values
Skills training and relaxation techniques

Indeed, activity scheduling alone demonstrates large effect sizes (Cohen's d = 0.87) when compared between intervention and control conditions [1]. For situational depression, behavioral activation helps break avoidance patterns by promoting alternative adaptive coping strategies [1].

Therapy for Situational Stress: CBT and Supportive Counseling

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) certainly stands as an effective treatment option for situational depression. During CBT sessions, you work with clients to become aware of thinking patterns creating issues in their lives [26]. CBT typically requires fewer sessions than other therapies, generally ranging from 5 to 20 sessions [26].

For adjustment disorder with depressed mood, CBT helps by teaching patients to appropriately deal with stress and low mood [27]. The therapy focuses on challenging thinking patterns and developing coping skills for stressful life situations.

Supportive counseling likewise plays a crucial role by strengthening social connections. Building and maintaining a strong support network remains vital in managing situational depression. Encouraging clients to talk with trusted friends or family provides emotional relief and a sense of connection [28]. Joining support groups, either in-person or online, helps clients connect with others experiencing similar challenges.

Lifestyle modifications—including regular physical activity, optimized sleep routines, stress management techniques, nutrient-dense diets, and strengthened social support systems—occasionally resolve situational depression without formal treatment [29].

Treatment Path B: Active Intervention for Clinical Depression

Once clinical depression has been diagnosed, your treatment approach must shift from facilitation to active intervention. Clinical depression typically requires structured therapeutic protocols combined with potential pharmacological support to address underlying neurobiological disruptions.

Structured Behavioral Activation and Sleep Regulation

Behavioral activation (BA) serves as a foundational treatment component for clinical depression, with meta-analyzes showing substantial efficacy (pooled effect size of 0.83) across 28 clinical trials [30]. BA primarily aims to increase positive interactions between individuals and their environment by systematically engaging them in rewarding activities.

The implementation process typically includes:

Daily activity monitoring to identify patterns of avoidance
Structured scheduling of activities that provide pleasure or mastery
Gradual reengagement with routine and goal-directed behaviors

Simultaneously, addressing sleep disturbances becomes critical in managing clinical depression. Sleep regulation strategies should focus on establishing consistent sleep-wake cycles, as poor sleep quality independently correlates with increased suicidal ideation [8].

Cognitive Restructuring and Pharmacotherapy Referral

Cognitive restructuring (CR) targets the distorted thinking patterns maintaining depression. CR sessions can range from brief interventions to extended treatment protocols of 8-16 sessions [11], with evidence showing that clinical improvement typically emerges after 6-8 sessions [11]. The process involves challenging cognitive distortions and generating alternative, more adaptive thoughts.

For moderate to severe depression, combined treatment approaches demonstrate superior outcomes. Research indicates that CBT combined with medication is markedly more effective than pharmacotherapy alone (g=0.51) [31] and maintains benefits at long-term follow-up. Under these circumstances, consider referral for medication evaluation, particularly when neurovegetative symptoms are prominent or when initial psychological interventions yield insufficient improvement.

Suicide Risk Monitoring and Psychiatric Collaboration

Given that depression contributes substantially to suicide risk, implementing systematic suicide risk monitoring becomes essential. This includes:

Regular assessment using validated instruments
Documentation of risk factors and protective factors
Clear safety planning protocols

In essence, collaborative care models involving therapists, primary care physicians, and psychiatrists offer the most comprehensive approach. Studies demonstrate that collaborative care interventions can effectively manage both depression and suicide risk [32]. Contact your patient weekly during the first month of antidepressant treatment to assess medication response and monitor for emergent suicidal ideation, which can occasionally increase during early treatment phases [33].

Conclusion

Throughout this article, you've gained valuable insights into one of the most challenging diagnostic distinctions in clinical practice. Differentiating between situational depression and clinical depression requires careful assessment beyond simple symptom matching. The 4-axis diagnostic framework presented here serves as your practical roadmap for making these crucial determinations.

First thing to remember, accurate differentiation directly impacts treatment effectiveness. When you correctly identify adjustment disorder with depressed mood, facilitated adaptation through psychoeducation, behavioral activation, and supportive counseling typically yields positive outcomes. Conversely, clinical depression necessitates more intensive interventions, including structured behavioral activation, cognitive restructuring, and potentially pharmacotherapy.

Most importantly, each axis of the diagnostic framework offers unique clinical insights. Proportionality assessment helps you evaluate whether emotional responses match stressor severity. The examination of hedonic capacity distinguishes situational sadness from true anhedonia. Self-concept integrity assessment reveals whether fundamental changes to identity have occurred. Additionally, responsiveness to support and environmental changes often differentiates temporary reactions from entrenched depressive states.

Despite symptom overlap, these conditions follow distinctly different trajectories. Situational depression generally resolves within 6 months as individuals adapt to stressors, whereas clinical depression frequently requires targeted intervention to prevent chronicity. Undoubtedly, the stakes of misdiagnosis remain high—overpathologizing normal reactions risks unnecessary treatment, while underdiagnosing clinical depression delays crucial care.

The presence of clinical markers such as persistent anhedonia, melancholic features, and neurovegetative symptoms should alert you to the likelihood of major depressive disorder requiring active intervention rather than simply supportive care. These qualitative differences, though sometimes subtle, provide essential information for appropriate treatment planning.

Though diagnosis presents challenges, your careful application of this structured assessment approach will significantly improve diagnostic accuracy. The framework presented here moves beyond symptom checklists to capture the phenomenological differences between these conditions, ultimately enhancing your ability to provide effective, appropriate care for your clients experiencing depressive symptoms regardless of their origin.

Key Takeaways

Understanding the difference between situational and clinical depression is crucial for providing appropriate treatment and avoiding both over-pathologizing normal stress responses and under-treating serious mental health conditions.

• Use the 4-axis diagnostic framework: assess proportionality to stressor, anhedonia vs. situational sadness, self-concept integrity, and responsiveness to support • Situational depression maintains capacity for joy and resolves within 6 months; clinical depression shows persistent anhedonia and neurovegetative symptoms • Adjustment disorder requires facilitated adaptation through psychoeducation and behavioral activation; clinical depression needs active intervention including potential medication • Clinical markers like melancholic features, sleep disturbances, and suicidal ideation indicate major depressive disorder requiring intensive treatment • Misdiagnosis affects 57% of MDD cases, making structured assessment essential for proper treatment selection and patient outcomes

The distinction between these conditions isn't merely academic—it fundamentally shapes your treatment approach and directly impacts recovery outcomes. Mastering this differential diagnosis enhances your clinical effectiveness while ensuring clients receive the most appropriate level of care for their specific condition.

FAQs

How can I differentiate between situational and clinical depression?

Situational depression is typically triggered by a specific stressful event and resolves within 6 months, while clinical depression often persists longer without a clear trigger. Situational depression maintains the capacity for joy, whereas clinical depression involves persistent anhedonia and more severe symptoms like sleep disturbances and suicidal thoughts.

What are the key symptoms of clinical depression?

Clinical depression is characterized by persistent anhedonia (inability to feel pleasure), significant changes in sleep and appetite, profound fatigue, feelings of worthlessness, and potentially suicidal thoughts. These symptoms are more severe and long-lasting compared to situational depression.

How is situational depression treated?

Treatment for situational depression focuses on facilitating natural adaptation through psychoeducation, behavioral activation, and supportive counseling. Techniques include normalizing grief reactions, scheduling rewarding activities, and strengthening social support networks.

When should medication be considered for depression?

Medication should be considered for moderate to severe clinical depression, especially when neurovegetative symptoms are prominent or when initial psychological interventions yield insufficient improvement. Combined treatment approaches (therapy plus medication) often show superior outcomes for clinical depression.

How long does situational depression typically last?

Situational depression, also known as adjustment disorder with depressed mood, typically resolves within 6 months after the stressor or its consequences have ended. If symptoms persist beyond this timeframe, it may indicate a transition to clinical depression requiring more intensive intervention.