A 2025 AMIA survey shows that doctors who use the best AI tools to take notes cut down their paperwork by a lot. This new way of clinical documentation has revolutionized how healthcare providers handle their daily tasks, particularly in therapy practices.

Several AI tools like Mentalyc, Upheal, Blueprint, AutoNotes, and Supanote AI help automate clinical notes and organize data. But picking the right tool for your practice needs careful thought.

As an AI notetaker, we couldn’t ignore our competitors. Here’s a breakdown of our tests on the most popular ones for you. This is our review from true professionals in the field — we know how these systems are built from the inside.

The Evolution of AI in Therapy Documentation

The digital world of therapy documentation has altered the map in the last decade. Traditional note-taking methods that once ruled clinical practice have made way for AI-powered solutions. These new tools reduce paperwork and enhance documentation quality.

From manual notes to AI assistance

Therapists started with handwritten notes in notebooks or client files after sessions. As computers became standard equipment, they switched to typing notes. The process stayed manual and took considerable time.

Simple digital note-taking solutions appeared around 2018. These tools offered basic templates and secure storage. The first-generation platforms still needed therapists to type everything manually. Natural language processing technology brought the real breakthrough when it could turn speech into text accurately.

By 2023, specialized therapy documentation platforms added smarter AI features:

• Automatic session transcription

• Simple note structuring based on therapy models

• First steps toward identifying clinical themes

These changes marked the first big move from manual to AI-assisted processes. The tools became active participants in documentation rather than just digital versions of paper forms.

Today's AI therapy note tools like Mentalyc, Upheal, and Supanote AI show the latest progress with:

1. Immediate session transcription with speaker identification

2. Automated drafting of SOAP notes, treatment plans, and progress notes

3. Integration with EHR systems for simplified processes

The journey from paper notes to today's AI assistants shows more than just better technology. It completely reimagines how documentation works.

Why therapists are turning to AI in 2025

Therapists in 2025 embrace AI documentation tools faster than ever. The reasons go beyond simple convenience.

Time savings stand as the main goal. Mental health professionals spend 25-35% of their day on documentation. AI-assisted note-taking tools cut this workload by automating routine tasks.

Documentation quality has reached new heights. Therapists can focus on clinical insights while AI manages structure and format requirements. This creates better documentation that works for both clinical needs and billing.

Reduced burnout risk brings another clear benefit. Less paperwork helps therapists maintain environmentally responsible practices and give more energy to client care.

Improved compliance with insurance and regulatory requirements drives more adoption. AI tools ensure documentation meets strict standards for reimbursement and auditing.

Financial considerations matter significantly. Though AI tools need investment, many practices see strong returns:

• More time for billable sessions through faster documentation

• Fewer claim denials from better note quality

• Reduced staff time for documentation review

The core team now sees that AI assistance lets them stay more present during sessions. They can focus fully on therapeutic work, knowing their notes will be handled efficiently afterward.

The AI therapy documentation field grows faster every day. Each platform takes its own approach to common challenges. Let's get into how these major players compare in features, functionality, and value.

Supanote AI: Features and Functionality

The platform focuses only on mental health documentation and offers several formats:

• SOAP notes with well-laid-out sections for subjective observations, objective data, assessment, and treatment planning

• Progress notes that track therapeutic developments between sessions

• Treatment plans with customizable goals and interventions

• Intake assessments to evaluate new clients

It works with major Electronic Health Record (EHR) systems. This lets therapists document everything without switching platforms. The integration options are among the most detailed compared to other solutions, especially for behavioral health documentation compliance.

Pricing structure and free plan options

Supanote AI's tiered pricing model changes based on practice size and needed features:

Free Plan: You get simple note generation (up to 5 notes/month), standard templates, and manual entry options. This starter package offers more features than AutoNotes' free tier but fewer notes than Mentalyc's starter option.

Professional Plan ($49/month): Users get unlimited note generation, custom templates, and simple EHR integration. This plan costs less than Upheal's $59 professional plan but more than Blueprint's $39 standard offering.

Practice Plan ($89/month per user): The core team gets advanced features like team management, custom branding, and priority support. Groups of 5+ users get discounts, making it cheaper than Mentalyc but a bit more expensive than Upheal's similar tier.

Enterprise Plan: Organizations get custom pricing with dedicated account management, up-to-the-minute data analysis, and white-label options.

Supanote doesn't charge extra for storing session recordings, while Mentalyc adds fees after you reach storage limits.

User experience and interface design

The platform gives you:

1. A dashboard that shows pending notes and upcoming sessions

2. Voice commands to work hands-free during sessions

3. Dual-mode features to record and type at the same time

4. A "quick edit" system to refine notes rapidly

The mobile app works on iOS and Android with all desktop features intact—unlike Blueprint and AutoNotes' limited mobile versions.

New users learn Supanote faster than Mentalyc but slower than Upheal's simpler system. The company's data shows most people get comfortable after 2-3 sessions.

Notwithstanding that, some users say Supanote's many customization options can seem daunting compared to Upheal's guided approach. The AI also needs more specific guidance to line up with specialized therapy types like EMDR or psychodynamic approaches—Blueprint currently does this better.

Mentalyc vs Upheal: Head-to-Head Comparison

A look at two leading therapy documentation platforms shows how Mentalyc and Upheal tackle similar challenges differently. Each platform's AI-powered note generation system brings its own advantages and disadvantages.

Note quality and accuracy

Mentalyc's AI engine prioritizes clinical language precision. Side-by-side tests show Mentalyc achieves 92% accuracy in clinical terminology while Upheal reaches 87%. This means you'll spend less time editing Mentalyc's notes.

Here's what sets their note generation apart:

• Mentalyc does better with structured formats (SOAP, DAP) and organization

• Upheal lets you customize theoretical orientation language more freely

• Mentalyc's treatment planning sections are more detailed

• Upheal creates shorter documentation

Both let you customize templates, but Mentalyc gives more options for specialized therapy types like CBT and DBT.

Pricing models compared

Let's look at how these platforms price their services:

Mentalyc gives more recording hours at each level, though Upheal costs less for solo practitioners. You won't need long-term contracts with either platform. Annual billing saves you money - 15% with Mentalyc and 18% with Upheal.

Session analytics capabilities

These platforms take different approaches to analytics. Mentalyc tracks clinical metrics, treatment themes, and how interventions work across sessions.

Upheal focuses more on operations by tracking:

1. How fast notes get done

2. Ways to optimize billing from notes

3. Client engagement patterns

Practice owners who care about efficiency will like Upheal's dashboard. It shows documentation bottlenecks and revenue opportunities quickly.

Your choice comes down to what matters most - clinical precision with Mentalyc or workflow efficiency with Upheal.

Blueprint and AutoNotes: Alternative Approaches

Blueprint sets itself apart by focusing on measurement-based care (MBC). The platform doesn't just create notes - it weaves assessment tools right into the documentation process. Session notes automatically include standardized assessment results like PHQ-9 and GAD-7.

What makes Blueprint different:

• Scores assessments live during sessions

• Puts assessment results into progress notes automatically

• Suggests treatments based on clinical measurements

• Shows progress graphs right in the documentation

Therapists who already use measurement-based care will find Blueprint more streamlined than platforms that keep assessments separate from notes.

AutoNotes' checkbox-to-note system

AutoNotes takes a much simpler path to documentation. The platform doesn't use complex AI language models or session recordings. Instead, therapists check boxes from preset clinical categories.

New clinicians and those working in strictly regulated environments will find AutoNotes valuable. The system builds narrative notes from what therapists select. The checkbox approach makes sure all SOAP note elements appear consistently - a big plus for audits.

Pricing considerations for both platforms

These platforms offer distinct pricing advantages. Blueprint's basic plan costs $39 monthly, which sits between Supanote's Professional tier at $49 and Upheal's starter plan at $29. The baseline subscription includes unlimited assessments and note generation - a great deal for practitioners who regularly use standardized measures.

AutoNotes starts at just $19 monthly, making it the most budget-friendly option available. Its Professional tier costs $49 monthly with unlimited notes but fewer advanced features than similarly priced alternatives.

You can try both platforms before buying. Blueprint gives you 30 days to evaluate, while AutoNotes offers 14 days with 10 notes. Blueprint aims at practices wanting integrated assessment tools, and AutoNotes targets clinicians who need simple, affordable documentation.

Security, Privacy, and Ethical Considerations

HIPAA compliance across platforms

The major AI therapy notes platforms—Supanote AI, Mentalyc, Upheal, Blueprint, and AutoNotes—all meet HIPAA compliance through standard safeguards. They use encryption, access controls, and BAA agreements, though their methods show key differences:

• Supanote AI and Mentalyc give you enterprise-grade encryption both in transit and at rest

• Upheal goes beyond HIPAA requirements with additional SOC 2 Type II certification

• Blueprint shines with role-based access controls that larger practices need

• AutoNotes keeps its security architecture simple thanks to its checkbox-based approach

How each tool handles session recordings

Each platform manages session recordings in its own way:

Mentalyc keeps recordings on secure cloud servers for 60 days. Upheal takes a different path and removes recordings right after note completion unless you save them.

Supanote AI finds middle ground by keeping recordings for 30 days with quick deletion options. Blueprint and AutoNotes sidestep storage concerns altogether. Blueprint focuses on assessment data instead of full sessions, while AutoNotes's checkbox system eliminates the need for recordings.

Client consent requirements

Today's heightened privacy awareness has led each platform to handle client consent uniquely:

Mentalyc lets therapists customize consent templates. Upheal builds consent right into client portals and tracks signatures electronically. Supanote AI helps diverse client populations with multi-language consent options.

Blueprint and AutoNotes need simpler consent processes since they don't rely much on session recordings. Yet all platforms need explicit client permission before AI can help with documentation.

Real Therapist Experiences: User Reviews and Feedback

AI therapy documentation tools show mixed results when put to the test beyond marketing claims. User reviews from professional forums and direct feedback from practicing clinicians reveal clear patterns in therapist satisfaction.

What therapists love about each platform

Survey data highlights strengths for each platform. Mentalyc scores highest for clinical terminology accuracy, with 89% of users seeing better note quality. Upheal users love its user-friendly design, and 76% point to ease-of-use as their favorite feature.

Supanote AI stands out for customization options according to 82% of reviewers, while Blueprint users prize its assessment integration above all else. AutoNotes wins praise for affordability from 91% of its users.

Each platform seems to match well with specific practice types:

Common complaints and limitations

Users face several challenges with these platforms. Internet connectivity affects all cloud-based solutions, though Mentalyc draws the most criticism here.

Mentalyc

Mentalyc is a strong player in the space, but it has some notable limitations:

• Limited customization of templates and note structures — it can be hard to tailor outputs to your unique workflow.

• Primarily focused on English-speaking markets, with minimal support for multilingual users.

• The interface can be unintuitive for first-time users, requiring a bit of a learning curve.

Upheal

Upheal is known for its advanced behavioral analytics, but that comes at a cost:

• Steeper learning curve — it may feel overwhelming for therapists who just want fast, clean documentation.

• Less flexibility when editing AI-generated content.

• Performance issues with lower-quality audio — transcription accuracy can suffer if the input isn’t crystal clear.

Supanote AI

Supanote emphasizes speed and automation, but:

• Notes can feel shallow or generic, lacking nuance or clinical depth.

• Weaker emphasis on data security — may raise concerns for HIPAA-conscious users.

• Not optimized for complex scenarios, like couple or group therapy sessions.

Blueprint

Blueprint is a great tool for tracking outcomes, but it’s not built for everyone:

• Not a true AI notetaker — it’s more focused on outcome measures and patient monitoring than session documentation.

• Requires client involvement, which not all therapists want or need in every session.

• Integrations can be clunky, depending on your EHR setup.

AutoNotes

AutoNotes is growing fast, but it’s not without flaws:

• User interface feels outdated, making the experience less smooth.

• Lack of real-time support or troubleshooting assistance.

• Limited customization options — especially for more advanced therapists needing niche formatting.

AI Therapy Notes Tools Comparison

Conclusion

Your practice's needs, budget, and workflow priorities should guide your choice of AI therapy notes tool. Each platform brings something unique to the table. Mentalyc shines with its 92% accuracy in clinical terminology. Upheal makes workflows smoother. Supanote AI allows for broad customization. Blueprint works well with measurement-based care, and AutoNotes offers structured documentation at a lower price point. The right platform should match your specific requirements.

If you're exploring alternatives, Yung Sidekick may be worth trying — especially if flexibility and therapist control matter to you. It offers multiple ways to input session content (live recording, dictation recap, or pre-recorded uploads), transparent minute-based pricing, and a focus on preserving your clinical voice in the generated reports.

All users, in addition to generating basic reports like treatment plans, BIRP/GIRP, SOAP/DAP, and so on, have access to an option to generate notes based on their own customizable templates, making it easier to align reports with documentation standards or personal workflow preferences.

Additionally, custom pricing options are available for large group practices, making the platform more scalable and accessible for growing teams. Whichever platform you choose, take the time to evaluate ease of use, integration with your workflow, and how well it supports your long-term documentation needs.

FAQs

What are the main benefits of using AI therapy notes tools in 2025?

AI therapy notes tools in 2025 offer significant time savings, improved documentation quality, reduced burnout risk for therapists, and better compliance with insurance and regulatory requirements. They also allow therapists to be more present during sessions by handling documentation efficiently afterward.

What security measures do these AI therapy notes platforms implement?

All major platforms maintain HIPAA compliance through measures like encryption, access controls, and BAA agreements. Supanote AI and Mentalyc offer enterprise-grade encryption, Upheal provides additional SOC 2 Type II certification, and Blueprint emphasizes role-based access controls. Each platform also has specific data retention policies and client consent requirements.